Re: Relicensing of Chandler source code

On May 30, 2006, at 8:46 AM, Jeffrey Harris wrote:

> I find the perceived GPL incompatibility issues very confusing.   
> Because
> patent protection didn't seem particularly pertinent to vobject, I  
> chose
> Apache 1.1 for it.  I have no objection to Apache 2.0, I agree it  
> would
> be nice to have consistency, as long as no one ends up with the
> impression they they can't use it in their GPL project.

If you are concerned about GPL compatibility, then we ought to leave  
vobject on ASL 1.1 at least
until GPL 3.0 comes out.

Ted
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _

Open Source Applications Foundation "General" mailing list
http://lists.osafoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/general