Re: Re: [Chandler-dev] Milestone and general naming, terminology

At 06:06 PM 8/29/2006 -0700, Katie Capps Parlante wrote:
>Perhaps both Cosmo and Chandler could use the "m" notation for milestones 
>between releases?

I'd personally prefer to stick with using "alpha" to denote interim 
releases, as I believe those are more widely-understood terms for the 
audience(s) that those releases are directed at, and because of the 
cost/benefit of making such a change.  But that might just be because I'm 
not seeing what the benefit is; it's not as if Cosmo and Chandler are using 
a common technology platform for creating releases.  Perhaps the intended 
benefit of consolidation lies somewhere else that I'm not immediately seeing?

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _

Open Source Applications Foundation "General" mailing list
http://lists.osafoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/general