Re: Re: [Chandler-dev] Milestone and general naming, terminology

Philippe Bossut wrote:
> Conclusion, I'm inclined to:
> - replace our use of "beta" by "Preview" for all our marketing 
> communication
> - use "dogfood" internally when talking about our "alpha" milestones
> - not change our use of "alpha" by something else in our numbering scheme
I often see projects release multiple preview releases and call them 
PR1, PR2, etc. I'm not sure if OSAF will decide to do the same with 
Chandler (it partly depends on user feedback to PR1, I suppose), but I 
thought that it might be useful to mention it, just so there is room for 
this kind of incremental numbering if it becomes necessary.

Davor
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _

Open Source Applications Foundation "General" mailing list
http://lists.osafoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/general