Re: Re: [Chandler-dev] Milestone and general naming, terminology
Jared Rhine <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.org.osaf.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Thu, 2006-08-31 at 01:22 -0700, Pieter Hartsook wrote: > BTW, I do like the term "preview"-version since it connotes > work-in-progress/more to come... I haven't absorbed the full thread, nor do I have a constructive proposal, but I'd like to note that I dislike the use of "Preview" unfortunately. Currently, much of the "street vibe" is that OSAF has been around a long time but (as I saw in an outside thread recently) "has never produced anything anyone can use". I'm afraid that "Preview" continues to promote that message. "Great, a Preview; here's another in a long line of "sneak peaks" at what OSAF may someday do". I'd prefer a message that, "it's rough, but it's Real now; not just a preview". Beta at least implies "real, ready, try it out now". More pondering to do... -- Jared Rhine <[email protected]> _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ Open Source Applications Foundation "General" mailing list http://lists.osafoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/general