Re: [Last Call] OSAF Wiki for Preview
Ted Leung <twl-6zGkXsw2EZWGJGYlWa3Ukdi2O/[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.org.osaf.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
+1 On Dec 6, 2006, at 4:59 PM, Katie Capps Parlante wrote: > Hi Priscilla, > > I'd support your proposal. > > Perhaps we could make "ask everyone to go through and deprecate" > more concrete -- I don't think we actually want *everyone* to be > sidetracked by this project. > > We could divide it up and assign owners to different pieces. > Certainly it makes sense to give some of this to me, Philippe, > Sheila, yourself, Ted, Aparna, etc. > > Would it make sense for you to list out high level categories which > we could assign owners to? If it is not immediately obvious, I can > work with you on the categories/owners. > > Cheers, > Katie > > Priscilla Chung wrote: >> Not sure if everyone had the chance to read this. Please speak up >> if you have any questions/additional comments on this proposal for >> the wiki. >> *Next Actions:* >> + After creating some templates/styles for the new wiki we plan to >> copy and migrate all the existing files over. Then ask everyone to >> go through and deprecate old pages which are no longer useful. >> See additional options and full proposal below. >> *Timeline:* >> We're working towards mid/end December (oh yes it's Dec already!) >> to update the framework and look-and-feel, then a second round in >> 2007-Q1 for final wiki pruning. >> Thanks, -Priscilla >> On Nov 27, 2006, at 10:32 AM, Priscilla Chung wrote: >>> The current wiki is running Twiki 4.0.1; the new wiki will run >>> Twiki 4.0.5. The default templates on the new wiki are CSS-based, >>> and we'll be updating the look-and-feel to be based on the new >>> default templates. >>> >>> *GOAL* >>> Our goal is to try and have people pointing to the new wiki >>> before the Preview launch dates. This will help make things >>> easier for people outside the organization to find the most >>> recent information when running searches on the wiki (and in >>> Google). >>> *OPTIONS* >>> The following options have been proposed. The pros and cons of >>> each are listed out on the wiki page: http:// >>> wiki.osafoundation.org/bin/view/Journal/DraftWikiProposal >>> >>> + Option 1: Copy and migrate all the existing files over, ask >>> everyone to go through and deprecate old pages which are no >>> longer useful. >>> + Option 2: Start completely fresh. Perhaps even to use a >>> different wiki. Link back to the old wiki site, but as a read- >>> only view. The old wiki site will not be maintained, only one >>> wiki will be 'in production'. + Option 3: Copy only selected >>> pages over. Link back to the old wiki site, but as a read-only >>> view. So if people would want to move a page over to the new wiki >>> after migration, they would have to create a new page on the new >>> Twiki. Once again only one wiki site is in production and >>> maintained. >>> >>> *PROPOSAL* >>> + The wiki team will be working on new templates, layout and >>> sections based on the taxonomy work by Ted/Mimi: http:// >>> wiki.osafoundation.org/bin/view/Journal/WikiReTaxonomy >>> + We're deciding to go with option #1: Copy all the wiki pages >>> and migrate all the existing files over to the new server. >>> Excluding some obvious sections ie. trash, other pages which are >>> deprecated. + Locate all the important pages and map them to the >>> new hierarchy. ie. Journal to Notes section, some sections in >>> 'Projects' need to be moved to the new 'Planning' section. >>> + Ask everyone to do some wiki gardening on their own sections >>> and deprecate any pages which are no longer relevant. >>> + Send out a last call to review any last wiki pages left on the >>> old wiki site. >>> + The plan is to only have a single wiki in production, so after >>> the defined 'cut-off' date all the old content will be available >>> under the new UI. + Continue to follow up with more wiki pruning >>> into 2007 as needed. >>> >>> *TIMELINE* >>> We're working towards December to update the framework and look- >>> and-feel, then a second round in 2007-Q1 for final wiki pruning. >>> >>> We'd like to ask if anyone has any concerns before we move >>> forward with the proposal. >>> _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ >>> >>> Open Source Applications Foundation "General" mailing list >>> http://lists.osafoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/general >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> --- >> _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ >> Open Source Applications Foundation "General" mailing list >> http://lists.osafoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/general > > _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ > > Open Source Applications Foundation "General" mailing list > http://lists.osafoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/general _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ Open Source Applications Foundation "General" mailing list http://lists.osafoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/general