Re: Re: Planning and Notes Wiki Areas

Ted Leung <twl-6zGkXsw2EZWGJGYlWa3Ukdi2O/[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.org.osaf.general
Message-ID <[email protected]>
On Mar 30, 2007, at 4:48 PM, Mimi Yin wrote:

> From a Product Planning perspective, the Standalone Chandler Server  
> product will probably eventually look very different from the  
> Chandler Hub product. For example, what is currently the Account  
> Browser may get a UI overhaul aimed at people running home servers  
> or servers for small companies, etc. But Chandler Hub users may  
> never see/use the Account Browser.
>
> Even today, we have some competing use cases around the various  
> URLs users can access/hand out from the end-user UI. Anyhow, we  
> don't need to have that section in the Planning area just yet,  
> since there isn't anything to put there...but the Planning and  
> Product Areas are technically organized by Product...and we've  
> talked about how eventually Chandler Server will be it's own  
> product. But I may be jumping the gun on this one.

Ok, well I guess I don't see us having two separate versions of the  
code for Chandler Server, which is ultimately where that leads.  But  
we can talk about that after Preview.


>>>
>>> + I've also added quicklinks in the right-hand sidebar to PPD  
>>> Contributor Notes and Active Specs / Projects (e.g. Branding)
>>>
>>> =====
>>>
>>> http://wiki.osafoundation.org/Projects/NotesArea
>>> + I've taken a few choice links from the Journal WebHome: Events,  
>>> Mailing list stuff and IRC
>>
>> The events page is totally out of date
>
> Yup, who can I pass the buck to? Pieter?

Pieter

>> The names of some mailing lists are unclear.  We don't have list  
>> named 'dev'.  It's called 'chandler-dev'.  Same for 'cosmo', it's  
>> 'cosmo-dev'
>> I think we should drop the IRC office hours pages.  We don't  
>> really have them any more, it's a vestigial reference.
>>
>
> Yup, again, who can I pass the buck to? Pieter?

I'll do these.

>>> + The meetings notes that used to live in Journal will live under  
>>> Teams in the new taxonomy
>>>
>>> + I've also added quicklinks to the various TEAM pages in the  
>>> right-hand sidebar.
>>>
>>> Is there anything else that should go in the Notes Area?
>>>
>>> To recap the new Notes Area is meant to be a Sandbox area for  
>>> contributors...basically all the 'unofficial' stuff. The meeting  
>>> notes are actually kind of official...and also belong under Teams.
>>
>> The top of the page says home of all things un-official.  Does  
>> that mean this is also a place for anyone to put up journal pages  
>> or is it restricted to staff/interns/SoC folks?
>>
>
> There are community member pages in there as well. Not sure if we  
> want to draw a line between staff and community. We haven't until now.

I think it should stay the same.

>>>
>>> *ATTENTION* Each of the Teams pages should link in the right-hand  
>>> sidebar to the Contributor Notes page of all team members. Please  
>>> side right-hand sidebar of the PPD Team page: http:// 
>>> wiki.osafoundation.org/Projects/DesignGroup
>>
>> So is it time for me to start working on the Cosmo Team page?  I  
>> haven't done anything with it.
>>
>
> Yaaa. Please.

Just change my job description to Wiki Gardener...   Ok, I'll take a  
look.

Ted

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _

Open Source Applications Foundation "General" mailing list
http://lists.osafoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/general
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.