Re: Re: Planning and Notes Wiki Areas
Ted Leung <twl-6zGkXsw2EZWGJGYlWa3Ukdi2O/[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.org.osaf.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Mar 30, 2007, at 4:48 PM, Mimi Yin wrote: > From a Product Planning perspective, the Standalone Chandler Server > product will probably eventually look very different from the > Chandler Hub product. For example, what is currently the Account > Browser may get a UI overhaul aimed at people running home servers > or servers for small companies, etc. But Chandler Hub users may > never see/use the Account Browser. > > Even today, we have some competing use cases around the various > URLs users can access/hand out from the end-user UI. Anyhow, we > don't need to have that section in the Planning area just yet, > since there isn't anything to put there...but the Planning and > Product Areas are technically organized by Product...and we've > talked about how eventually Chandler Server will be it's own > product. But I may be jumping the gun on this one. Ok, well I guess I don't see us having two separate versions of the code for Chandler Server, which is ultimately where that leads. But we can talk about that after Preview. >>> >>> + I've also added quicklinks in the right-hand sidebar to PPD >>> Contributor Notes and Active Specs / Projects (e.g. Branding) >>> >>> ===== >>> >>> http://wiki.osafoundation.org/Projects/NotesArea >>> + I've taken a few choice links from the Journal WebHome: Events, >>> Mailing list stuff and IRC >> >> The events page is totally out of date > > Yup, who can I pass the buck to? Pieter? Pieter >> The names of some mailing lists are unclear. We don't have list >> named 'dev'. It's called 'chandler-dev'. Same for 'cosmo', it's >> 'cosmo-dev' >> I think we should drop the IRC office hours pages. We don't >> really have them any more, it's a vestigial reference. >> > > Yup, again, who can I pass the buck to? Pieter? I'll do these. >>> + The meetings notes that used to live in Journal will live under >>> Teams in the new taxonomy >>> >>> + I've also added quicklinks to the various TEAM pages in the >>> right-hand sidebar. >>> >>> Is there anything else that should go in the Notes Area? >>> >>> To recap the new Notes Area is meant to be a Sandbox area for >>> contributors...basically all the 'unofficial' stuff. The meeting >>> notes are actually kind of official...and also belong under Teams. >> >> The top of the page says home of all things un-official. Does >> that mean this is also a place for anyone to put up journal pages >> or is it restricted to staff/interns/SoC folks? >> > > There are community member pages in there as well. Not sure if we > want to draw a line between staff and community. We haven't until now. I think it should stay the same. >>> >>> *ATTENTION* Each of the Teams pages should link in the right-hand >>> sidebar to the Contributor Notes page of all team members. Please >>> side right-hand sidebar of the PPD Team page: http:// >>> wiki.osafoundation.org/Projects/DesignGroup >> >> So is it time for me to start working on the Cosmo Team page? I >> haven't done anything with it. >> > > Yaaa. Please. Just change my job description to Wiki Gardener... Ok, I'll take a look. Ted _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ Open Source Applications Foundation "General" mailing list http://lists.osafoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/general