Re: Re: Report a bug directions
Aparna Kadakia <aparna-6zGkXsw2EZWGJGYlWa3Ukdi2O/[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.org.osaf.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Sheila, Just to clarify the utility is available to public, it's just not scaled to handle large number of users. I believe disk space is one of the main requirements. Aparna On Jun 15, 2007, at 4:42 PM, Sheila Mooney wrote: > So it sounds like we don't currently have a way for users to submit > their repository so we shouldn't refer to that in the documentation > until we do. We could raise the priority but I don't know the > reality of getting this done for Preview at this stage. I think > this is why we made it a P4 in the first place. It's really a new > feature. > > It's assigned to Jared right now. Jared, do you have any thoughts? > > On Jun 15, 2007, at 4:31 PM, Dan Steinicke wrote: > >> This bug should not be closed. The current repo-submit server is >> only intended for, and capable of dealing with internal users. If >> we want to use repo-submit with the general public we need to move >> it to a different server and that is what this bug is about. >> Currently this bug is P4, perhaps we need to raise the prioritly. >> >> Dan >> >> Sheila Mooney wrote: >>> So if it already works, shouldn't this bug be closed? >>> >>> On Jun 15, 2007, at 4:18 PM, Bryan Stearns wrote: >>> >>>> Yep: https://bugzilla.osafoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7139 >>>> >>>> Sheila Mooney wrote: >>>>> I thought there was a bug logged for a public repository submit >>>>> mechanism. I don't remember if we punted this or we are still >>>>> intending on doing this for Preview. >>>>> >>>>> On Jun 15, 2007, at 11:35 AM, Ted Leung wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> I think that the pages that Mimi is working on are really >>>>>> targetted for the Preview launch timeframe. At that point, I >>>>>> think we want to deal with all users uniformly... >>>>>> >>>>>> Ted >>>>>> >>>>>> On Jun 14, 2007, at 9:14 PM, Aparna Kadakia wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> We also have the instructions for dogfooders page which >>>>>>> instructs users on how to report problems, log files, >>>>>>> repositories etc. >>>>>>> There is also overlap between this page and the ReportABug page. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> http://chandlerproject.org/Projects/InstructionsForDogfooders >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Aparna >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On Jun 14, 2007, at 6:19 PM, Mimi Yin wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> How about this? >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> http://chandlerproject.org/Journal/ReportABug >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> At the top, I added a short definition of what a bug is and >>>>>>>> a pointer to the Chandler Users list for people who don't >>>>>>>> feel like their issue is concrete enough for a bug report. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Right below that are 2 columns, 1 for the Desktop and the >>>>>>>> other for Chandler Hub/Server. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> The instructions are very brief. Mostly telling you to check >>>>>>>> to see if your problem has been logged and a note about what >>>>>>>> extra info to include. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> I've consolidated the overlapping material at the bottom. >>>>>>>> It's mostly process stuff about how to log a good bug report >>>>>>>> and how bugs are process. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Anything else we want to add? Do I have the right >>>>>>>> prioritization in terms of what info should be above the >>>>>>>> fold / below the fold? >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Mimi >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On Jun 14, 2007, at 5:49 PM, Ted Leung wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> IOn Jun 14, 2007, at 4:55 PM, Mimi Yin wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> http://chandlerproject.org/Projects/ReportingBugs >>>>>>>>>> http://chandlerproject.org/bin/view/Projects/ >>>>>>>>>> ReportingBugsCosmo >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Who is the target audience for Reporting bugs? >>>>>>>>>> Do we expect end-users to report bugs? >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> I definitely expect end users to report bugs. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Should we unify these pages? There's a lot of overlap and >>>>>>>>>> it seems like for end-users, we mostly want to pinpoint >>>>>>>>>> where they experienced their problem and send them on >>>>>>>>>> their way accordingly... >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> + Chandler Desktop >>>>>>>>>> + Chandler Hub / Chandler Server >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> There's a bunch of common stuff about how/when to file a >>>>>>>>> bug, and it seems like a waste to duplicate that. But I >>>>>>>>> also agree that we want it to be clear and easy to report >>>>>>>>> problems on the correct product. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Ted >>>>>>>>> _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ >>>> >>> >>> _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ >>> >>> Open Source Applications Foundation "General" mailing list >>> http://lists.osafoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/general > > _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ > > Open Source Applications Foundation "General" mailing list > http://lists.osafoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/general _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ Open Source Applications Foundation "General" mailing list http://lists.osafoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/general