Re: What's left to do on the wiki?

On Jun 25, 2007, at 8:27 PM, Mimi Yin wrote:

> Hi,
>
> Sheila asked me to compile a list of the remaining wiki tasks to  
> figure out next actions...
>
> Push out
> + Wiki Homepage
> + Planning Wiki Area
> + Engineering Wiki Area
> + Notes Wiki Area
>
> Deprecate
> + Projects
> + Journal
>
> Questions:
> + Do we need to have all of the content in place before we push out  
> the remaining high-level wiki areas? Perhaps we could just put in  
> placeholder text for now? Or get everyone to do a first pass by the  
> end of next week? I'm concerned that if we wait until all of the  
> content is in, we won't leave ourselves enough time to test the  
> next wiki areas.
>
> + JARED: What are you preparing to put on the wiki for the Service?
>
>
> LIST OF MISSING CONTENT
>
> Wiki Homepage: http://chandlerproject.org/Product/ChandlerProjectHome
> + Tagline and Project Description: MIMI and KATIE
> + Technologies section: KATIE
> + Review Community stuff: TED

I've got this one

> + Engineering wiki area description: KATIE
> + Planning wiki area description: SHEILA
>
> Community Area: http://chandlerproject.org/Projects/CommunityArea
> + Open Issue: Is it okay for Get Involved to just be a part of the  
> Community Wiki Area? - TED, SHEILA, KATIE?

I think that Get Involved is probably a page that can be linked from  
multiple places.  I am happy to own that if that is what you are asking

>
> Planning Area: http://chandlerproject.org/Projects/PlanningArea
> + High level description - SHEILA
>
> Engineering Area: http://chandlerproject.org/Projects/EngineeringArea
> + Open issue: How is what's on this page different from For  
> Developers? - KATIE / TED / PHILIPPE?
> - http://chandlerproject.org/Journal/ForDevelopers

I mostly agree with Katie's note on this -- I'll put my comments in a  
reply to her note.

Ted

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _

Open Source Applications Foundation "General" mailing list
http://lists.osafoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/general