Re: Re: URLs for Preview Release

On Jul 7, 2007, at 7:45 AM, Mimi Yin wrote:

> Hi Jared, See in-line. Ted, there are some questions for you as  
> well. There are a number of Cosmo-specific issues to be ironed out.
>
> What's the difference between the Cosmo Team page, the Cosmo  
> portion of the Developer Area page and the current Cosmo Home page?  
> It feels like there are too many views into the same content.
>
> http://chandlerproject.org/Projects/EngineeringArea
> http://chandlerproject.org/Projects/CosmoTeam
> http://chandlerproject.org/Projects/CosmoHome
>
> I think CosmoHome should probably be split up between the Developer  
> Area and Cosmo Team pages and deprecated. I've logged a bug against  
> Ted to keep track of this issue: https://bugzilla.osafoundation.org/ 
> show_bug.cgi?id=9820

I agree.   My goal is for us to end up with an empty CosmoHome after  
all relevant content has been moved.   We can then delete that page.

>
> As for the About Chandler Hub... in particular, where we point  
> people depends on whether we think they'll be end-users or  
> developers. If it's an end-user link, then we should probably just  
> point them to the landing page. Ted, do you have any thoughts on this?

I am fine with end users going to the landing page.  I'm not sure  
what it means to be a developer on the Hub.   Server developers  
should get sent to the Developer Area.


>
>>
>> It's possible that after Preview\ we'll find that not have product- 
>> specific homepage/landing pages even on the wiki is kinda weird  
>> and we'll want to create some.  At that point, the /cosmo link  
>> could be redirected.
>>
>>> + Cosmo Help: chandlerproject.org/faq*??*
>>
>> Best practice is to ship release-specific documentation with a  
>> product itself.  Our use of wiki pages is something of a shortcut,  
>> based on cosmo-dev list discussions.  Long term, I think it's very  
>> possible we'll want to switch to going to product-specific help  
>> links.
>>
>> For Cosmo, the current plan of record is to create a page on the  
>> wiki for each release and code that into the software.  That page  
>> can then be made to be release-specific or just include the  
>> contents of a more general page for now.
>
> Okay, who owns that?

Cosmo product management....

Ted

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _

Open Source Applications Foundation "General" mailing list
http://lists.osafoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/general