Re: Wiki web name for EngineeringArea

On Jul 10, 2007, at 1:13 PM, Mimi Yin wrote:

> Ok, I think I know where I got lost. You proposed we combine Get  
> Involved and For Developers (I think) and we had discussed /  
> decided earlier to combine For Developers with the Engineering Area  
> and call it Developer Area instead. So now I guess I'll go back to  
> asking why  we need to have separate Community and Get Involved  
> pages. It seems like the 2 are 2 sides of the same coin. (Here's  
> how to get involved...Here's why we care about you getting involved  
> and what does it mean to get involved.)

Look at the difference in content between:

<http://chandler.osafoundation.org/getinvolved.php>

and

<http://chandlerproject.org/Projects/CommunityArea>

Assume that we delete the section called "get involved" from the  
Community Area page.   There's then very little overlap between those  
two pages.   I think that the two pages serve very different  
purposes.   One is a set of gentle onramps for people to find a way  
to get involved based on tasks.  The Community Area page is one level  
above that -- it includes the governance, the various roles, etc.   I  
think that combining those pages puts too much information in a  
single place.

>
> Perhaps it's a matter of balancing the elements on that page? De- 
> emphasize the notes for example and blow up the Get Involved area.
>
> I imagine this as a destination for understanding our open design  
> process, mailing list etiquette and best practices for discussing  
> issues and making decisions, etc...
>
> Mimi
>
> On Jul 10, 2007, at 1:03 PM, Ted Leung wrote:
>
>> On Jul 10, 2007, at 12:45 PM, Mimi Yin wrote:
>>
>>> I think Ted's proposal was to change the Developers Area to a  
>>> more generic Get Involved area. Ted?
>>
>> Nope, that's not my proposal -- I think we need a developer area  
>> and the more generic Get Involved page
>>
>>>
>>> On Jul 10, 2007, at 11:11 AM, Katie Capps Parlante wrote:
>>>
>>>> I think "Developer", "Develop", or "Development" would all be  
>>>> reasonable options -- I don't feel particularly strongly about  
>>>> one over another.
>>>>
>>>> Cheers,
>>>> Katie
>>>>
>>>> Jared Rhine wrote:
>>>>> The EngineeringArea is due to be pushed out as a new  
>>>>> chandlerproject.org wiki area, at the same level as "Product"  
>>>>> and "Teams".
>>>>> There are a couple options for the specific name to be used.  
>>>>> "EngineeringArea" is due to become "DevelopersArea", which  
>>>>> suggests "Developers" as wiki web area name.
>>>>> But "Develop" is shorter, and does not overlap conceptually  
>>>>> with "Teams".
>>>>> "Development" is also an option.
>>>>> PPD are the drivers for the wiki taxonomy, but anyone is  
>>>>> welcome to chime-in.
>>>>> Right now, I personally favor "Develop" for its brevity, but it  
>>>>> doesn't feel perfect.
>>>>> -- Jared
>>>>> _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
>>>>> Open Source Applications Foundation "General" mailing list
>>>>> http://lists.osafoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/general
>>>>
>>>> _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
>>>>
>>>> Open Source Applications Foundation "General" mailing list
>>>> http://lists.osafoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/general
>>>
>>
>> _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
>>
>> Open Source Applications Foundation "General" mailing list
>> http://lists.osafoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/general
>

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _

Open Source Applications Foundation "General" mailing list
http://lists.osafoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/general