Re: [Proposal] Rationalizing our Downloads pages

Delicious!

My one issue -- and I think it's probably not a big deal -- is that  
we have a red double-outlined box on ChandlerDesktopSource saying  
that the latest official Chandler release is “Release 0.6.1,  
2006-02-08”. Should I consider this an incentive to get Preview out  
the door :) ?

In any case, maybe the terminology in the two pages (Releases/ 
Milestones/Continuous vs Latest/At-Your-Own-Risk) could be synced or  
x-referenced better?

--Grant

On 12 Jul, 2007, at 10:58, Mimi Yin wrote:

> I've pulled together 2 sets of Download pages with some help from  
> Bear :)
>
> Downloading Chandler Desktop and Building Chandler Desktop from the  
> Source Code
> http://chandlerproject.org/Journal/DownloadChandlerDesktop
> http://chandlerproject.org/Projects/ChandlerDesktopSource
>
> Downloading Chandler Server and Building Chandler Server from the  
> Source Code
> http://chandlerproject.org/Journal/DownloadChandlerServer
> http://chandlerproject.org/Projects/ChandlerServerSource
>
> I'd like to move all download links to the Developers Wiki except  
> for Download Chandler Desktop, which should live in the recently  
> deprecated Projects Wiki and display as chandlerproject.org/ 
> download (as per the URL plan Jared and I worked out.)
>
> Does anyone see any issues with this proposal?
>
> Mimi
>
> _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
>
> Open Source Applications Foundation "General" mailing list
> http://lists.osafoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/general

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _

Open Source Applications Foundation "General" mailing list
http://lists.osafoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/general