Re: Cosmo wiki page questions
Ted Leung <twl-6zGkXsw2EZWGJGYlWa3Ukdi2O/[email protected]> Wed, 18 Jul 2007 23:32:01 -0700
| Newsgroups | gmane.org.osaf.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Inline On Jul 18, 2007, at 7:31 PM, Mimi Yin wrote: > Hi Ted, > > I think adding a link from the DownloadChandlerServer page is a > good idea. But I'm not sure which link to point people to: > > Which document are you referring to when you say 'guide/document > for people administering their own Chandler Server? http://chandlerproject.org/Developers/ServerBundleAdministrator > > I found a number of different Chandler Server related guides/ > manuals and had a few questions. > > Is this document up to date? Who is the intended audience? > http://chandlerproject.org/Documentation/ChandlerServerEndUserManual The document is not up to date for Cosmo 0.7, but the intended audience is people using Cosmo to share via CalDAV / WebDAV > > How is the EndUser Manual audience different from the Server Bundle > Adminsitrator audience? > http://chandlerproject.org/Developers/ServerBundleAdministrator One is for end users (although not the hub target user) the other is for the person who downloads Cosmo and needs to configure/set it up > > Should we point to the ServerBundleAdministrator page? or to the > ServerBundleInstallation page http://chandlerproject.org/Developers/ > ServerBundleInstallation Which page are you talking about point from? If it's from the download page, I'd say the ServerBundleInstallation page. > > There are also several FAQs > + http://chandlerproject.org/Developers/ServerBundleInstallation#FAQ > + http://chandlerproject.org/Developers/ServerBundleAdministrator#FAQ > > Should these be consolidated into the main FAQ? If the goal is to have a single FAQ, then yes, they ought to be consolidated and the page sections updated to point to the main FAQ > > Mimi > > On Jul 18, 2007, at 5:21 PM, Ted Leung wrote: > >> Hi all, >> >> I've been working to rationalize these pages >> >> http://chandlerproject.org/Projects/CosmoTeam >> http://chandlerproject.org/Projects/CosmoHome >> http://chandlerproject.org/Developers/WebHome >> >> according to our previous discussions. I've inserted most of >> the relevant content from CosmoHome into either CosmoTeam or >> Developers in preparation for deprecating CosmoHome altogether. >> >> However, as I did this I ran into some problems: >> >> + Chandler Server has (and needs) installation instructions. For >> now, I've put that on the Developer Area, but that feels a bit >> wrong -- it seems like that information ought to be accessible >> from the download page. > I've added a link to the DownloadChandlerServer page, but wasn't > sure which one to add: http://chandlerproject.org/Developers/ > DownloadChandlerServer > >> + There is also a guide/document for people administering their >> own Chandler Server. For now , I put that in the Developer Area, too > Which wiki page are you referring to? > >> + There's the question of how to cover the server bundle. >> Again, for the moment I've put the information that we had on the >> Developer Area > I'm not sure I understand this question. > >> + On CosmoHome, there was a list of releases along with the dates >> those releases happened. There is a similar but shorter list in >> the Planning area -- I would like to put the whole list, including >> dates on the Planning Area. > > That sounds fine. > >> >> Ted >> _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ >> >> Open Source Applications Foundation "General" mailing list >> http://lists.osafoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/general > _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ Open Source Applications Foundation "General" mailing list http://lists.osafoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/general