Re: defining requirements: use cases
"Michael R. Bernstein" <[email protected]> 07 Nov 2002 14:15:54 -0800
| Newsgroups | gmane.org.osaf.process |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <1036707355.14130.163.camel@fiawol> |
On Thu, 2002-11-07 at 14:00, Kaitlin Duck Sherwood wrote: > One thing that isn't clear to me is who *exactly* is the target > audience for Chandler and why they would adopt it. > > Some use case scenarios would be helpful, showing who uses Chandler > and why. It might also be useful to write some scenarios for people > who do *not* swtich to Chandler to illustrate which market segments > you are willing to leave behind. I've been waiting for the existence of an 'official' OSAF collaborative documentation environment, such as a wiki, before I start creating those. In general, I've found that posting those kind of documents on a mailing list will start a discussion, which then peters out, and none of which gets captured in an easily referenced form. NNTP groups are better, in some ways, but are still a discussion medium (who posted and when, about what, what they posted), not a documentation medium (This is a document, here is how it changed and when, and who did it). Cheers, Michael Bernstein. _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ Open Source Applications Foundation "Process" mailing list http://lists.osafoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/process