Re: [Dev] Source Code Revision Control Infrastructure

--PEIAKu/WMn1b1Hv9
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Sat, Nov 09, 2002 at 11:15:57PM -0800, Michael R. Bernstein wrote:
> I am cross-posting this to the 'dev' and 'process' lists at Mitch's
> suggestion. It was part of a longer summary of the types of
> infrastructure both the community and OSAF core developers need.
>=20
> Mitch also confirmed that the OSAF currently intended to use CVS.
>=20
>=20
> Source Code Revision Control=20
> ----------------------------=20
>=20
> I'll let others more qualified than myself discuss their relative
> merits, but there seem to be three contenders for this piece of
> infrastructure:=20
>=20
> * CVS - http://www.cvshome.org/
>=20
> * Subversion - http://subversion.tigris.org/

There isn't much to think when choosing between those two: Subversion is=20
developed by the same guys who are maintaining CVS. Subversion is
self-hosting for over a year now without any problems and it is rapidly=20
approaching 1.0 .

> * arch - http://www.fifthvision.net/open/bin/view/Arch/WebHome

I don't follow arch too closely but by comparing the mailing list
archives traffic, the subversion community is bigger and the developers
are more active.

Just my $.02,
florn

--=20

"If it's not broken, let's fix it till it is."

41A9 2BDE 8E11 F1C5 87A6  03EE 34B3 E075 3B90 DFE4

--PEIAKu/WMn1b1Hv9
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.0 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQE9zhl7NLPgdTuQ3+QRAlDdAJ4vL7+jl2d53IPqS/eh3maMC1FoowCgiF0H
x9wAeTQqIsDHZnqWMRfBWjA=
=nzru
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--PEIAKu/WMn1b1Hv9--
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _

Open Source Applications Foundation "Process" mailing list
http://lists.osafoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/process