Re: [Dev] Source Code Revision Control Infrastructure
Wes Felter <[email protected]> Sun, 10 Nov 2002 14:53:18 -0600
| Newsgroups | gmane.org.osaf.process,gmane.org.osaf.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <B9F4235E.46879%[email protected]> |
on 11/10/02 1:15 AM, Michael R. Bernstein at [email protected] wrote: > Source Code Revision Control > ---------------------------- > > I'll let others more qualified than myself discuss their relative > merits, but there seem to be three contenders for this piece of > infrastructure: > > * CVS - http://www.cvshome.org/ > > * Subversion - http://subversion.tigris.org/ > > * arch - http://www.fifthvision.net/open/bin/view/Arch/WebHome You omitted the most powerful choice, BitKeeper. Although its licensing is a bit complex, I think it's at least worth evaluating. http://www.bitkeeper.com/ Wes Felter - [email protected] - http://felter.org/wesley/ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ Open Source Applications Foundation "Process" mailing list http://lists.osafoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/process