RE: Infrastructure needs
"Michael R. Bernstein" <[email protected]> 11 Nov 2002 18:57:01 -0800
| Newsgroups | gmane.org.osaf.process |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <1037069821.920.79.camel@fiawol> |
On Mon, 2002-11-11 at 16:07, Morgen Sagen wrote: > > > [...] most people will > > continue to interact with the mailing lists rather than the > > news server, resulting in the threading on the news server > > being frequently broken due to sub-par MUAs replying via the > > mailing list. > > [...] > > Michael, > > Having never run an NNTP <--> mailinglist gateway, I'm not aware of this > particular problem. Can you explain? Is this a mail header issue? Yes, it's a mail header issue, not too different from the issue of threading in a mailing list. If an MUA is used to compose a reply where that MUA does not add 'References:' or 'In-Reply-To:' headers, than when the message is gatewayed to the NNTP server, there is no way for a newsreader to reconstruct a thread. This is just as problematic as on a mailing list, except that it is completely unnecessary. NNTP clients invariably support the appropriate headers, as threading is central to the Net News medium, while many email clients do not. In short, gatewaying the mailing list (unless it is most people's second choice, as with the comp.lang.python newsgroup) removes one of the NNTP server's main advantages, that of strong explicit threading. I suppose it's possible for the gateway to *guess* what the 'References:' header should be based on the subject (and maybe the mailman gateway does this), but that's not much of an improvement. Cheers, Michael Bernstein. _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ Open Source Applications Foundation "Process" mailing list http://lists.osafoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/process