Re: Not sure if this news is real, or a spoof...
Akshay Mishra <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.org.telecom.india-gii |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CABSY_ZtvwgpDGwzdhToNZQd1mbGzoAnSTcJtZP=iM3CWSoOr=Q@mail.gmail.com> |
I was part of a team developing a product for a telecom major in India few years back. It was a Internet + display developed in-house. After having completed everything, the board reviewed and there were comments like requiring redder red and brighter blues and other hues. After this insightful discussion, everybody was packed off except the marketing chap, the CEO and myself. The CEO then took the device went to a couple of porn sites - checked if he see moving images at the lowest resolution. After being satisfied this way, he went to discuss commercials after telling - this is the only thing that is viewed across the country and if hope to touch sufficient volumes we should ensure that the content that is desired is visible. I walked enlightened. :-) India might have to outsource re-production from the way these people talk about sex. -Akshay On 12 July 2013 20:40, sajan venniyoor <[email protected]> wrote: > On 11 July 2013 21:00, Sarbajit Roy <[email protected]> wrote: > >> There was a public notice today in some leading newspapers from Rajya >> Sabha. >> Persons watching cyber porn will be severely published. Law being put >> in place, objections/suggestions are invited from public to Amend IT >> Act. >> http://164.100.47.5/newcommittee/press_release/Press/Committee%20on%20Petitions/Cyber.pdf > > > According to the petitioner, internet porn leads to "dangerously > increasing" numbers of teenage pregnancies. This must be true, as data > suggests that "teen pregnancy in India is high with 62 pregnant teens out > of every 1,000 women. In comparison, 24 British teens get pregnant before > their 19th birthday while the figure is 42 in the US" *(2008 UNFPA > report). * > > At least half those pregnant Indian teens could be watching internet porn > with their men, as 47% of our girls are married off before 18. > > Sex education is also to blame. The petitioner believes that it helps > spread "free sex culture and increase in pornography" and leads to sticky > biology text books in school libraries or something. > > Sajan > > >> >> Does India-Gii wish to engage ?? CAN India-Gii engage ? >> >> On 7/11/13, Srini RamaKrishnan <[email protected]> wrote: >> > I'd like to remind the list that the honorable minister insisted not >> > too long back that every Facebook and Orkut post and youtube video had >> > to be reviewed by a FB / Google employee before posting it to the web >> > to produce a safer web. >> > >> > He is a crusader par excellence for the safety of the web; his record >> > speaks volumes for how safe he has made the web. Without his earnest >> > efforts the web would have been a hive of filth and immorality. >> > >> > >> > >> > >> >> _______________________________________________ >> India-gii mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://frodo.hserus.net/mailman/listinfo/india-gii >> > > > _______________________________________________ > India-gii mailing list > [email protected] > http://frodo.hserus.net/mailman/listinfo/india-gii > > _______________________________________________ India-gii mailing list [email protected] http://frodo.hserus.net/mailman/listinfo/india-gii