Re: NEWSWEEK: Manipulating Wikipedia to Promote a Bogus Business School

Ratnendra Pandey <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.org.telecom.india-gii
Message-ID <[email protected]>
This news article is more misleading than the advertisement by school in question. It seeks to create  an impression of some kind of legal sanction against Wikipadea. Am I missing something? At the end of the day it is privilege of a website to decide who keeps an admin and editing privileges. So what is the issue here?

As for some people duped by the said business school, how is that fault of wikipadea? If the said school had a giant billboard next to a road, should the state,or pad, or nhai be responsible for what is written on the bill board.

God save india from these misguided activists and diabolical legal heads like Sarabjit, and the people who write laws that even give some credence to the filings by Sarabjit, and allow strained legal system to be further strained.


I do not see what is so difficult to understand in the idea that you cannot legislate intelligence nor you can protect an idiot no matter how you regulate. Crooks will find ways to dupe fools. It is in best interest of idiots to acquire some intellegence and learn from there own mistakes and from those of others.

Sincerely,
Ratnendra Pandey


From: [email protected]
Date: Fri, 27 Mar 2015 10:58:18 +0530
To: [email protected]
CC: India-gii-IAPFreCvJWP2/[email protected]
Subject: Re: [india-gii] NEWSWEEK: Manipulating Wikipedia to Promote a Bogus Business School

Kudos, for a job well done.

On Thu, Mar 26, 2015 at 9:40 PM, sarbajit roy <[email protected]> wrote:
Manipulating Wikipedia to Promote a Bogus Business School



http://www.newsweek.com/2015/04/03/manipulating-wikipedia-promote-bogus-business-school-316133.html

By Alastair Sloan / March 24, 2015 12:20 PM EDT



Vickram and/or veteran Wikimedians on this channel can know that on 13

March 2015 I had already filed a formal IT Act case concerning

'inter-alia' these gangs of rogue extortionate Wikipedia

administrators hiding behind their anonymity and multiple fictitious

IDs and who have given Indian Wikimedians a bad name.



In my complaint I have asked for "Wifione" to be unmasked and

prosecuted for ruining the lives of thousands of Indian students. My

action was preceded by 2 years of dialog by our side with fellow

Wikipedians / WMF and a 3 month action in Switzerland brought by WMF

against me which then gave me a cause of action to file the IT case in

India.



In our instances, we were subjected to illegal demands and financial

threats since 2013 and my dialog with Wikimedia Foundation's legal

counsel repeatedly ran into a brick wall of solid indifference and

evasions to protect their anonymous admins. It was only thanks to a

proactive Indian board member that things started moving and 5 old

time Wikimedia Admins were eventually "globally banned" in December

2014 as a result of coordinated efforts between veteran members of the

WIKIMEDIA community who had seceded in 2008 from the WMF's "projects"

after realizing what d****b*gs they were.



Sarbajit



_______________________________________________

India-gii mailing list

India-gii-IAPFreCvJWP2/[email protected]

https://lists.india-gii.org/mailman/listinfo/india-gii



-- 
regards,
Banibrata
http://www.linkedin.com/in/bdutta
http://twitter.com/edgeliving


_______________________________________________
India-gii mailing list
India-gii-IAPFreCvJWP2/[email protected]
https://lists.india-gii.org/mailman/listinfo/india-gii

_______________________________________________
India-gii mailing list
India-gii-IAPFreCvJWP2/[email protected]
https://lists.india-gii.org/mailman/listinfo/india-gii
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.