Re: cellular operator association has bizarre interpretation of Net neutrality
Banibrata Dutta <[email protected]> Thu, 7 May 2015 18:38:36 +0530
| Newsgroups | gmane.org.telecom.india-gii |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CALODqprrfkDuf3eJndc-vScJwo7tBTTKceS7N8H1v=RFBYuHAg@mail.gmail.com> |
If pure-play data ISP's can offer competing and sometimes much better data plans (check out ACT, YOU...), without any cross-subsidy from voice revenue, I wonder how can voice-centric telco's cook up this 6x increase in data-tariffs figure, especially given the massive difference in scale, at which the two operate. The pure-play data ISP has to contend with high (but not as high as RF) capex, and very high opex, due to the very challenging last-mile. Is the mobile telco's argument then boil down to cost of spectrum alone ? On Thu, May 7, 2015 at 5:59 PM, Kiritkumar Lathia <[email protected]> wrote: > Arun, > > Interesting definition indeed! > > I suppose they have sent sms to their clients asking them whether they > wish data rate to go up 6x or have "net neutrality" / "level playing field" > - so a normal person would agree with the second one as nobody wants their > data cost increased! > > What they are highlighting is the issue with "internet" per-se globally. > The classic example was in USA where the "pipe provider" was (long > distance) AT&T and it went bankrupt. It was bought by a "baby bell" mobile > company and kept the name AT&T). Most of the investment is in providing > connectivity and the "last mile" people (ISP or mobile) make (some) money > by direct link with end customer. > > All, incl. mobile operator, use IP since the circuit switched "exchanges" > are being phased out rapidly since they are no longer economical. The main > revenue return-on-investment was and still is "voice"; so if OTT > cannabilises the main revenue stream, who pays for the massive investments > required? > > Best wishes, > Kirit > > On 7 May 2015 at 08:43, Arun Mehta <[email protected]> wrote: > >> The cellular operators want the exact opposite of Net neutrality. They >> want anyone offering Net telephony, such as Skype, Whatsapp and Google >> Hangouts, to be forced to obtain a license and pay license fees. If not, >> they will be forced to raise the cost for the awful data connectivity they >> offer by up to 6 times! Gee. Blackmail! >> >> They claim that within 10 days of launching an online campaign, they >> already have 4 million messages of support. >> >> I would like to know how they formulated the questions they asked. >> Unfortunately, you can't get any information from their website, until you >> register. Talk about openness. >> >> Airtel has already received a thrashing on Net neutrality. What does COAI >> expect, after such blackmail attempts? >> >> warmly, >> >> Arun Mehta >> >> >> http://tech.firstpost.com/news-analysis/net-neutrality-cellular-operators-association-gets-support-of-4-million-indians-265981.html >> >> Four million mobile subscribers have supported COAI’s campaign favouring >> net neutrality for internet-based communication services like WhatsApp and >> Skype and their being subject to norms similar to those applying to mobile >> phone operators, the apex body of cellular operators said. >> >> “Sabka Internet, Sab ka Vikas — the campaign for net neutrality, net >> equality and consumer choice, has received support from over 40 lakh Indian >> mobile users in under a week,” the Cellular Operators Association of India >> (COAI) said in a statement here. >> >> “The entire mobile number database of supporters is auditable on request >> by the appropriate agency,” it added. >> >> Launched last week, “Sabka Internet, Sab ka Vikas”, a campaign about >> making the Internet accessible and affordable for every Indian, seeks a >> level playing field with net-based services like Skype and WhatApp. >> >> The industry body said if the telecom operators are not offered a level >> playing field with net-based services, then their businesses would be >> viable only by raising data prices by up to six times. >> >> It comes against the backdrop of the debate over net neutrality and >> allegations that telecom operators are hurting the concept of free internet >> access by giving preferential treatment to a select few service providers. >> >> “COAI started the outreach effort to ensure that mobile customers have >> the freedom to benefit from the power of the Internet in the way they would >> wish to, including the choice of platform, device and technology,” said >> COAI director general Rajan S. Mathews. >> >> The net neutrality principle came into focus in India following mobile >> operator Airtel’s launch of an open marketing platform ‘Airtel Zero’, and >> the Telecom Regulatory Authority of India’s consultation paper on whether >> telecom firms could be allowed to charge different rates for different uses >> of Internet data such as e-mail, browsing and for use of apps like >> Whatsapp, Viber and Skype. >> >> *IANS* >> >> _______________________________________________ >> India-gii mailing list >> India-gii-IAPFreCvJWP2/[email protected] >> https://lists.india-gii.org/mailman/listinfo/india-gii >> >> > > _______________________________________________ > India-gii mailing list > India-gii-IAPFreCvJWP2/[email protected] > https://lists.india-gii.org/mailman/listinfo/india-gii > > -- regards, Banibrata http://www.linkedin.com/in/bdutta http://twitter.com/edgeliving _______________________________________________ India-gii mailing list India-gii-IAPFreCvJWP2/[email protected] https://lists.india-gii.org/mailman/listinfo/india-gii