Re: why strict Net neutrality works best: simple beats complex

Narendra Sisodiya <narendra-djpCnAWmwNRnjiQx+Zhyb1aTQe2KTcn/@public.gmane.org> Wed, 20 May 2015 12:15:48 +0530
Newsgroups gmane.org.telecom.india-gii
Message-ID <CAB80A6_0A5ByyULGth0j9dKB_1pbuxbJwMsgqRFvka04x+AcLQ@mail.gmail.com>
I simply do not understand that why people are saying telco put huge
investment or telco need lots of money for infrastructure.
See we public are not responsible for profit or loss statements for any
telco or any corporate body. Every day lots of farmers suicide because of
loss.

It is very simple to understand that public need good Internet service
provider who do not interfere or look into streams. Its like if i invent
new solar technology then oil and gas will complain abt their loss.

If telco need more money then telco can increase price of data recharge.
Let all telco compete with each other and we can get minimum price for data
packet.

Strict net neutrality is good public. Bad for money hungry teleco. I just
want to say one last thing..

Dear telco, Please design or create new business model where telco can get
the profit with following strict net neutrality. We are ready to pay
whatever it cost.

In my view, in near future telco will become pure Internet provider as now
a days nobody use sms and in future nobody will use phone call too. People
will shift to voip completely. I use watsapp voice calling to talk to
person from delhi to mp. I save huge money. I am saving money on roming
too. This conclude only one thing telco is charging too much.
If telco want to compete with voip players then they should also launch
their app too.

Last but most important, because of open and neutral Internet, i can think
for starting a small company which can give competition to skype. But Never
in dream i can think for competing Airtel or Idea. You know the reasons.
 On 20-May-2015 10:15 AM, "Arun Mehta" <[email protected]> wrote:

>
>> All of us would agree that any use of shared resource needs some
>> policing - if for nothing else - to at-least prevent it from being
>> hogged completely by rogue elements to the extent it becoming
>> unusable.
>
>
> Huh? All of us certainly do not agree, doesn't the rest of your argument
> collapse, then?
>
> What rogue elements are you talking about, pray?
>
> Arun Mehta
>
> _______________________________________________
> India-gii mailing list
> India-gii-IAPFreCvJWP2/[email protected]
> https://lists.india-gii.org/mailman/listinfo/india-gii
>
>

_______________________________________________
India-gii mailing list
India-gii-IAPFreCvJWP2/[email protected]
https://lists.india-gii.org/mailman/listinfo/india-gii