Re: Why is Mark Zuckerberg angry at critics in India?
ken <[email protected]> Sun, 3 Jan 2016 13:15:28 -0500
| Newsgroups | gmane.org.telecom.india-gii |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On 01/03/2016 12:28 PM, Ratnendra Pandey wrote: > What ken suggesting about costs and pricing is misleading and false. > > All prices are paid by consumers. > Repeat with me. > All prices are paid by consumers. Sure, you could look at it that way but that would also not be entirely accurate. One specific example would be someone who does not subscribe to the Internet or those who use the net but do not pay for it. In the US, that percentage is est9mated to be above 30%. I am quite certain that in India the percentage of the total population who either don't use the Internet or use it but do not pay for it is significantly higher. In point of fact, you can delude yourself into believing everything is a supply sided equation but we Americans have learned beyond a shadow of a doubt that this is a fallacy. The concept of a free market is exactly that, an idea that is likely to never exist in much the same way a pure communistic government is unlikely to ever be feasible. And for what few experiments have been attempted, the end result is a society where monopolies rule unimpeded. Ken DiPietro Cumberland MD