Re: Why is Mark Zuckerberg angry at critics in India?

Dear Ken,

Your inputs have been valuable contributions. You should not give up just
because we have had inputs from one person living in Wonderland with:
"imagination as the only weapon in the war against reality and my Reality
is just different", said the Cheshire Cat.

I have learnt from all other inputs so thanks to all.

Arun, I think here we have agreed that only Open Internet should be allowed
and it really comes down to the Indian Government to ensure that all ISPs
provide "net neutrality".

Best wishes,
On 3 Jan 2016 8:25 pm, "ken" <[email protected]> wrote:

Sir,

I have better things to do with my time that address such profound
ignorance.

If this is the level of discourse this list has degenerated to, I will now
take my leave.

Good luck to you all moving forward.

In closing,

Ken DiPietro
Cumberland MD.


On 01/03/2016 02:01 PM, [email protected] wrote:

> What is said about Monopolies are false too. Monopolies are rarely
> permanent.
> And during the short period  when it is possible for monopolies to
> generate above market profits
>  for its owners, enough suppliers are attracted to the market with better
> product
> and business model to make monopolies ineffective.
>
>
> Care to list Monopolies that have survived without government protection?
> Monopolies and inherently unstable and open to attack.
>
> The communist/socialist economist and ideologues have carefully created
> fear
>  of monopolies to justify government takeover of private businesses.
>
> Sincerely,
> Ratnendra Pandey
>
> On 1/3/2016 10:15 AM, ken wrote:
>
>> On 01/03/2016 12:28 PM, Ratnendra Pandey wrote:
>>
>>> What ken suggesting about costs and pricing is  misleading and false.
>>>
>>> All prices are paid by consumers.
>>> Repeat with me.
>>> All prices are paid by consumers.
>>>
>>
>> Sure, you could look at it that way but that would also not be entirely
>> accurate.
>>
>> One specific example would be someone who does not subscribe to the
>> Internet or those who use the net but do not pay for it. In the US, that
>> percentage is est9mated to be above 30%. I am quite certain that in India
>> the percentage of the total population who either don't use the Internet or
>> use it but do not pay for it is significantly higher.
>>
>> In point of fact, you can delude yourself into believing everything is a
>> supply sided equation but we Americans have learned beyond a shadow of a
>> doubt that this is a fallacy. The concept of a free market is exactly that,
>> an idea that is likely to never exist in much the same way a pure
>> communistic government is unlikely to ever be feasible. And for what few
>> experiments have been attempted, the end result is a society where
>> monopolies rule unimpeded.
>>
>> Ken DiPietro
>> Cumberland MD
>>
>
>
>

_______________________________________________
India-gii mailing list
India-gii-IAPFreCvJWP2/[email protected]
https://lists.india-gii.org/mailman/listinfo/india-gii

_______________________________________________
India-gii mailing list
India-gii-IAPFreCvJWP2/[email protected]
https://lists.india-gii.org/mailman/listinfo/india-gii