Re: India regulator pillories Facebook over Free Basics lobbying - BBC news
Banibrata Dutta <[email protected]> Wed, 20 Jan 2016 18:30:34 +0530
| Newsgroups | gmane.org.telecom.india-gii |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CALODqpqkkZiHq44m-0jM9bV_Bum046_Gbi_d+Ns654Y3rUskaQ@mail.gmail.com> |
Fundamental, well founded and strong arguments there. TRAI letter to FB: http://trai.gov.in/WriteReadData/Miscelleneus/Document/201601190319214139629TRAI_letter_to_FB_dated_18_01_2016.pdf On Wed, Jan 20, 2016 at 2:12 PM, Kiritkumar Lathia <[email protected]> wrote: > A little bit more on the objections raised by IIT and IIS professors > (total 50+): > > ... The academics said in a statement that the Free Basics plan was "a > lethal combination which will lead to total lack of freedom on how Indians > can use their own public utility, the Internet". > [image: line break] > > The professors say there are three key problems > <http://scroll.in/article/778805/full-text-facebooks-free-basics-will-limit-internet-freedom-say-50-faculty-of-iits-and-iisc> with > Facebook's plans: > > - Facebook assumes control of defining what a "basic" service is. > - Facebook would be able to decrypt the contents of the "basic" apps > on its servers. This flaw is not visible to the lay person as it's a > technical detail, but it has deep and disturbing implications. > - The term "free" in "free basics" is a marketing gimmick. If Facebook > gets to decide what costs how much, in effect Indians will be surrendering > their digital freedom, and freedom in the digital economy, to Facebook. > > > So all communications decryted by FB - something not even governments can > do - so there goes privacy for profits and of course it would be "free and > basic" if it brings revenue stream to FB. > > Is it not wonderful (sic)? > > On 20 January 2016 at 09:01, Kiritkumar Lathia <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Follow up on Arun's previous e-mail chain; for once TRAI has taken the >> correct step to protect "net neutrality" which is important for not only >> India. As many have mentioned, there is no free lunch and this type of >> business by false advertising ("Free Basics") is not only morally wrong and >> should be regarded as falsifying a product (access of Internet for free but >> does not give access to Internet - only some selected parts of it). I hope >> it prevails and does not allow Internet cannibalisation . Any news on what >> happened to free Internet access from Google at train stations? >> >> From the BBC news article: >> Quote: >> " But those campaigning to protect net neutrality in India suggest data >> providers should not favour some online services over others by offering >> cheaper or faster access. At least 50 professors of the Indian Institute >> of Technology and the Indian Institute of Science also supported the >> campaign to protect net neutrality, saying that the Free Basics plan was "a >> lethal combination which will lead to total lack of freedom on how Indians >> can use their own public utility, the Internet". >> End Quote. >> >> Best wishes, >> Kirit >> >> >> >> > > _______________________________________________ > India-gii mailing list > India-gii-IAPFreCvJWP2/[email protected] > https://lists.india-gii.org/mailman/listinfo/india-gii > > -- regards, Banibrata http://www.linkedin.com/in/bdutta http://twitter.com/edgeliving _______________________________________________ India-gii mailing list India-gii-IAPFreCvJWP2/[email protected] https://lists.india-gii.org/mailman/listinfo/india-gii