Re: TRAI order on differential pricing
Kiritkumar Lathia <[email protected]> Mon, 8 Feb 2016 16:49:16 +0100
| Newsgroups | gmane.org.telecom.india-gii |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CAMkH0Gy2_0kk6DQtT60KCNLgmG_93Qp2qSoW0MMW6Q4Svj4oYA@mail.gmail.com> |
The reason I have doubt is that Fb free basic has one unique price for bits they wish to carry; those bits which do not address their walled garden eco-system are rejected (access denied), not priced differently - so differential pricing - but censorship and reject. On 8 Feb 2016 3:09 pm, "Mahesh Murthy" <[email protected]> wrote: > It resolves it fully. > On 08-Feb-2016 7:06 PM, "Kiritkumar Lathia" <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Interesting that it does not resolve the net neutrality issue raised by >> Fb "free basic" per se; unless blocking access to non-basic sites (decided >> by Fb) is considered as differential pricing??!! >> On 8 Feb 2016 12:01, "Tarun Dua" <lists-w/I/[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> >>> http://trai.gov.in/WriteReadData/PressRealease/Document/Press_Release_No_13%20.pdf >>> >>> -Tarun >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> India-gii mailing list >>> India-gii-IAPFreCvJWP2/[email protected] >>> https://lists.india-gii.org/mailman/listinfo/india-gii >>> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> India-gii mailing list >> India-gii-IAPFreCvJWP2/[email protected] >> https://lists.india-gii.org/mailman/listinfo/india-gii >> >> _______________________________________________ India-gii mailing list India-gii-IAPFreCvJWP2/[email protected] https://lists.india-gii.org/mailman/listinfo/india-gii