Re: security list
John Goerzen <[email protected]> Thu, 2 Oct 2003 13:01:13 -0500
| Newsgroups | gmane.org.user-groups.aclug.linux-help |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Thu, Oct 02, 2003 at 12:46:16PM -0500, M. Osten wrote: > Bugtraq is heavily moderated and censored (due to corporate interests), > so I wouldn't call it a "good" list. Sometimes I want a moderated and censored list. If you want to find out about patches for software you run and some security headlines, it's a good place to be. > A better list is Netsys's "Full Disclosure" list. Be prepared for the > usual flame-wars, and retarded banter, but also be prepared to be very > disturbed by the general lack of security in all software. "Full > Disclosure" usually has "0 day" bulitins and exploit code before anyone > else (and usually before the vendor even has been contacted). I've found that full disclosure has such a low signal-to-noise ratio that it's nearly useless. I don't care about exploit code except perhaps to verify that a fix has worked, so that's no extra benefit for me. -- This is the [email protected] list. To unsubscribe, visit http://www.complete.org/cgi-bin/listargate-aclug.cgi