Re: Making Windoz XP play nice with linux 9.0

That's good, I didn't know if they passed or not from the last message. 
 It seems that something you are installing isn't being built correctly. 
 I haven't had this happen before during an install, but I have had this 
happen to me when I added and removed programs with Synaptic.  ~Anne

Michael Holmes wrote:

>All three disk passed the redhat disk checking utility.
>
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]]
>On Behalf Of Anne McCadden
>Sent: Monday, April 12, 2004 9:34 PM
>To: [email protected]
>Subject: [linux-help] Re: Making Windoz XP play nice with linux 9.0
>
>Have you done MD5checksums of your iso images?  Do you suspect that one 
>of the iso are bad?  If the iso image isn't bad, then the OS isn't 
>building correctly.  You may have to do a smaller install first, reboot 
>and then install some more of the modules on round 2.  
>
>If you want a different copy of RH9.0, then I can make you a new set. 
> The iso images that I have are working great.  Right now I'm using 
>Fedora core 1 and Suse 8.2, the debian computer crashed because the mobo
>
>went bad.  ~Anne
>
>Michael Holmes wrote:
>
>  
>
>>I cannot get linux and windoz to play nice on my laptop.  Linux will
>>crash windoz when it is run ( booting failures and hanging log off's.
>>    
>>
>)
>  
>
>>And linux will complain of check sum failures.  These faults only show
>>up when the other has been run.  If linux is run consecutively, there
>>    
>>
>is
>  
>
>>no problems; if windows is run consecutively, then there is no
>>    
>>
>problems.
>  
>
>>I cannot figure out what to do.  I want and need both.  I used
>>    
>>
>partition
>  
>
>>magic to set up 6 gig for linux and 30 gig for windoz.  512 meg for
>>/boot and 1024 meg for /swap.   Brand new hard drive ( as linux said
>>    
>>
>too
>  
>
>>many failure to support the install ( check sum))
>>
>>I like the new install system on red hat 9.0   The very first thing it
>>does is check the disk.  ( I have been at 90 percent complete and have
>>    
>>
>a
>  
>
>>install crash because of a corrupted download)  I think the disk check
>>is the best improvement, especially since most installs are from
>>downloads of iso's.  
>>
>>Mike
>>
>>-- This is the [email protected] list.  To unsubscribe,
>>visit http://www.complete.org/cgi-bin/listargate-aclug.cgi
>>
>>
>> 
>>
>>    
>>
>
>-- This is the [email protected] list.  To unsubscribe,
>visit http://www.complete.org/cgi-bin/listargate-aclug.cgi
>
>-- This is the [email protected] list.  To unsubscribe,
>visit http://www.complete.org/cgi-bin/listargate-aclug.cgi
>
>
>  
>

-- This is the [email protected] list.  To unsubscribe,
visit http://www.complete.org/cgi-bin/listargate-aclug.cgi