Re: January Meeting?

If we're looking for objections, I'll voice a very small one... I
probably won't be there if it's just a social gathering.

If others want that, tho, then by all means go for it! :)

I'm (nearly) prepared, BTW, to give a presentation on SPAM/Virus
filtering of email at some point.

-- Jonathan


On Wed, 2003-01-08 at 11:02, Clint Brubakken wrote:
> I've heard no objections (Though John Alexander was suggesting Jezebels
> instead :) ),
> 
> 
> so in my position as Dicator-For-Life I say lets go for it, and send out
> the announcement tonight (I could even do it if you wanted)
> 
> 
> Torres at 7 on  Monday 1-13 . 
> 
> Speak now or forever hold your peace if you disagree
> 
> 
> 
> On Mon, 2003-01-06 at 12:16, Dale W Hodge wrote:
> > IIRC, we decided not to have a January meeting, instead to have some kind of
> > social.  What do we wnat to do and when do we want to have it?  Next Monday,
> > our usual meeting date?  If so, then where?  Torries?
> > 
> > --dwh
> > 
> > ---
> > Dale W Hodge - [email protected]
> > Vice Chairman & Secretary - [email protected]
> > Air Capital Linux User's Group  (ACLUG)
> > ---
> -- 
> 
> Clint Brubakken <[email protected]>
> Programmer Analyst
> Inetic Web Development
> ---
> Black holes are where God divided by zero.
> 
> -- Attached file included as plaintext by Ecartis --
> -- File: signature.asc
> -- Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
> 
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux)
> Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org
> 
> iD8DBQA+HFmE76JlAgniL3YRAku0AJ9k6ok9pmzPP1kZKEXF6+7GVavXkwCeJvVx
> zHIG2F6F1smoDmNtl8VedK8=
> =FAFf
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
> 
> 
>