Re: State of Website
Jeff Vian <[email protected]> Mon, 30 Sep 2002 03:49:45 -0500
| Newsgroups | gmane.org.user-groups.aclug.webdev |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Dale W Hodge wrote: >>-----Original Message----- >>From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]]On Behalf >>Of Jonathan Hall >> > >>I think that's a question you, Tom, and/or the rest of the web group can >>best answer. If you feel that Debian would make your job easier (and >>there's no objection from others), then lets use Debian. If a faster CPU >>and RAM are needed, lets scrounge those up. >> > >Tom has never used Debian, but I've been a Debian fan since shortly after I >joined ACLUG. Package management is sooo much easier on Debian. In fact, I had a >Debian machine up for nearly 400 days having performed software updates and even >a dist upgrade in that time. I don't think you could say that about RedHat. And >Debian is very security focused, and they make it easy to keep on top of >security patches. > >>I'm sure I have a ~P166 machine I could let ACLUG use for web development. >>If you have a place to host it, and want to run Debian on it, by all means >>do so. >> > >Right now the beta1 site is running on a P166 with 64Meg of RAM. That probabaly >adequate for now, but if we really start getting traffic I suspect we'll need a >bit more oomph... > >>I currently have a K63/450 running Debian I could give ACLUG some space on >>(but not root access). That machine may soon be replaced by something >>faster, which could make it available soley for ACLUG. >> > >That should be plenty machine. Root access isn't mandatory, as PostNuke has >been designed to work in a hosted enviroment. However limited root (sudo) >access would be helpful in getting some of the packages set up. > >>If nothing else, we could ask members for hardware and/or monitary donations >>to put together a machine for ACLUG web hosting. >> > >That's not a bad idea. I'm sure there are a number of people around with older >hardware that would love to put it to good use rather than scrapping it. Heck, >I've got several P200 or P233 CPU/MB's that I need to do something with. Slow >by today's standards, but too good to trash. > >--dwh > I have a K6-2 300 CPU but no matching mobo. Also have a K6-III 450 complete PC. Small drive ( 6 gb ) since it has been used as my firewall machine for the last 2 years. I am considering going to one of the small firewall/routers and would certainly donate the 300 CPU and maybe the full PC. The full PC is in a full size tower case with plenty of room for drives and hardware. --jlv