Suggestions: Next Meeting
"James G ." <[email protected]> Sun, 10 Feb 2002 10:45:53 -0600
| Newsgroups | gmane.org.user-groups.aclug.wichita |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
I think that if the majority of people who attend in person want to cater mostly to intermediates and experts, then that fact should be made clear to everyone "before" they attend thier first ACLUG meeting. As I see it, there are two main areas to cover when using a computing environment. They are the "operating system" and the "applications" that run on that OS. If we choose to concentrate on the applications only, we assume everyone knows how to use the underlying OS. Also, if this is the case, we should change the name of the group from "Linux Users Group" to "Open Source Users Group". This would eliminate confusion and also welcome users of other OS's so that they too can help participate in our discutions. "Open Source" applications run on MANY platforms. Their use is not limited to Linux users. If we assume that a group member should know how to use their OS, why limit membership to only Linux users? What about FreeBSD and Solaris people who use Apache also (not to mention MS Windows users who use it). Well, if this is the way the group chooses to go, then what about people who want to learn the GNU/Linux operating system itself? We as a group can choose to help them ourselves "or" instuct them on how to do it "for themselves" on thier own time. It seems to me that the latter would be the choice choosen by this group. So... why don't we be honest to all the new wanna-be Linux users out there and let them know what this group is "really" about. There is no reason at all to try and hide ACLUG'S true identity from the web page and from the public. I would like to eliminate misconceptions about what ACLUG is about. "Open Source" software is what we are all truly in love with. Me included. James Galimi On 2002.02.10 00:08 Michael Moore wrote: > > I have heard several people expression their concerns about the ACLUG > falling into a state of newbieism; in that, the meetings and > presentations have been catered to newbies and intermediates and that > the experts get bored and find no real reason to attend the meetings (no > benefit to them).