Re: [clug] Something is wrong with my Internet
Randall Crook <[email protected]> Tue, 8 Nov 2016 13:11:04 +1100
| Newsgroups | gmane.org.user-groups.clug |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Hi Tony, I have been having different problems with my optus ADSL service. May be related. I am in optus' "Reach" service which basically means optus wholesales from telstra and I get to pay $20 per month more for the privilege. But that's beside the point. I am getting drop outs. Lots of them in what appears to be random patterns. Drop outs of up to 2 to 3 minutes. After a few calls to optus and getting no where fast I decided to to gather some statistics. To make it as much on Optus as possible I setup their Sagemcom F@st 3864 so they can't complain about who's modem is at fault and wrote a script to gather some data. I also set the modem up to log to a syslog server so I can get an understanding of whats happening. I am glad I did as the data seems to be telling me the drop outs are not at the ADSL layer like I thought, but at the PPP layer. The ADSL is staying solid at 14Mb/s down and 1 Mb/s up all the time. The PPPoE on the other hand is dropping. Yesterday I had about 12+ drop outs mostly in the morning all lasting about 2 minutes. today so far only a couple. If your interested I can send you the script I knocked up as it has a crude bit of code to scrape data from the sagemcom web interface. Regards Randall. On 08/11/16 11:04, Tony Lewis wrote: > We recently moved house and I've been struggling to get my Optus ADSL > to perform like it should. > > I get sync speeds of 4800 up and somewhere between 160kbps-400kbps > down. I've tried ADSL2+ and ADSL1. > > It seems the connection is very sensitive to uploads. For example, I > am currently scp'ing a tar file to a hosted server with plenty of > bandwidth. Here's the corresponding ping times to google as things > progress: > > $ ping google.com > PING google.com (172.217.25.174) 56(84) bytes of data. > 64 bytes from syd09s13-in-f174.1e100.net (172.217.25.174): icmp_seq=1 > ttl=54 time=52.1 ms > 64 bytes from syd09s13-in-f174.1e100.net (172.217.25.174): icmp_seq=2 > ttl=54 time=43.8 ms > 64 bytes from syd09s13-in-f174.1e100.net (172.217.25.174): icmp_seq=3 > ttl=54 time=46.0 ms > 64 bytes from syd09s13-in-f174.1e100.net (172.217.25.174): icmp_seq=4 > ttl=54 time=44.1 ms > 64 bytes from syd09s13-in-f174.1e100.net (172.217.25.174): icmp_seq=5 > ttl=54 time=44.7 ms > 64 bytes from syd09s13-in-f174.1e100.net (172.217.25.174): icmp_seq=6 > ttl=54 time=45.0 ms > 64 bytes from syd09s13-in-f174.1e100.net (172.217.25.174): icmp_seq=7 > ttl=54 time=52.8 ms > 64 bytes from syd09s13-in-f174.1e100.net (172.217.25.174): icmp_seq=8 > ttl=54 time=52.5 ms > 64 bytes from syd09s13-in-f174.1e100.net (172.217.25.174): icmp_seq=9 > ttl=54 time=48.9 ms > 64 bytes from syd09s13-in-f174.1e100.net (172.217.25.174): icmp_seq=10 > ttl=54 time=674 ms > 64 bytes from syd09s13-in-f174.1e100.net (172.217.25.174): icmp_seq=11 > ttl=54 time=745 ms > 64 bytes from syd09s13-in-f174.1e100.net (172.217.25.174): icmp_seq=12 > ttl=54 time=969 ms > 64 bytes from syd09s13-in-f174.1e100.net (172.217.25.174): icmp_seq=13 > ttl=54 time=1387 ms > 64 bytes from syd09s13-in-f174.1e100.net (172.217.25.174): icmp_seq=14 > ttl=54 time=1736 ms > 64 bytes from syd09s13-in-f174.1e100.net (172.217.25.174): icmp_seq=15 > ttl=54 time=2087 ms > 64 bytes from syd09s13-in-f174.1e100.net (172.217.25.174): icmp_seq=16 > ttl=54 time=2417 ms > 64 bytes from syd09s13-in-f174.1e100.net (172.217.25.174): icmp_seq=17 > ttl=54 time=2909 ms > 64 bytes from syd09s13-in-f174.1e100.net (172.217.25.174): icmp_seq=18 > ttl=54 time=3289 ms > 64 bytes from syd09s13-in-f174.1e100.net (172.217.25.174): icmp_seq=19 > ttl=54 time=3872 ms > 64 bytes from syd09s13-in-f174.1e100.net (172.217.25.174): icmp_seq=20 > ttl=54 time=4558 ms > 64 bytes from syd09s13-in-f174.1e100.net (172.217.25.174): icmp_seq=21 > ttl=54 time=6284 ms > 64 bytes from syd09s13-in-f174.1e100.net (172.217.25.174): icmp_seq=22 > ttl=54 time=6864 ms > > It gets real horrible real fast. > > I am pursuing things with Optus, but wanted to see if: > > * this was in any way normal? > * there was anything else I could try to fix things. > > Currently I am using Optus' Sagemcom F@st 3864, which is pretty > universally reviled. I can't seem swap it out because Optus have > locked it somehow. Some think it's through MAC address whitelisting, > but logically that implies Ethernet packets, and there ain't none > going between me and them. It's in bridged mode, which gives me an > ATM interface on the modem and I can use my linux server as the PPPoE > end point. The ATM interface does have a MAC address, though. > > I've rooted the modem, so I can telnet in. It's a cut down Linux > (busybox-based) and while I can't figure out how to restart the > ATM/ADSL interface, I can reboot it. > > Blindly in the past I've been scripting a reboot every two hours. > This seems to help, but now I don't think so. I was under the > impression that some process on the modem was leaking memory, or > chewing CPU, or otherwise being aberrant, because a reboot gave me > back good ping times. > > But now I think that I got good ping times back because any upload was > killed or interrupted at least, and so it looked good until that > upload resumed, then it goes pear-shaped again. > > Downloads don't seem to be anywhere near as much of a problem. > > I've started logging lots of things, including using pmacct to measure > my netflows, but I only turned that on last night, so I need more time > to get useful data. > > Any suggestions? > > Tony > > -- -- Randall Crook [email protected] -- linux mailing list [email protected] https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/linux