[clug] RedHat OpenSource And Proprietary
George at Clug <[email protected]> Sun, 11 Dec 2016 09:21:10 +1100
| Newsgroups | gmane.org.user-groups.clug |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
I have often wondered where RedHat sits with being FOSS, OpenSource, and/or Proprietary So today I searched the intenet, and did not find a simple answer, just lots of rambling Can anyone explain to me if Red Hat is OpenSource or Proprietary. And how much of the proprietary code it purchases does it then open up to the OpenSource community? What features/programs are available in Red Hat but not in other Linux Distributions because these are proprietary to Red Hat? Is there a chance that Red Hat will become a different Linux which will not be compatible with other Linux distributions due to being more proprietary than OpenSource? What is the history of KVM? I believe that Red Hat has provided this technology to OpenSource (FOSS?). Yesterday using Virt-Manager I tried to migrate a VM from CentOS to Debian and also from Debian to CentOS, but due to differences in environments I was not able to. This may only be differences in folder layouts, but are there larger differences? I realise that drivers for hardware that are provided by the hardware manufactures, are mostly not OpenSource and are proprietary, but what about Red Hat's proprietary code? Where does this sit? Can Red Hat code be 100% compiled from source? (excepting for hardware driver specific code). https://linux.org.au/introduction-linux-free-software-and-open-source https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Red_Hat http://www.stromian.com/Book/Chap12.html -- linux mailing list [email protected] https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/linux