Re: [clug] low power device for VPN end point

Alex Ferrara <alex-ptpq7S77OxPh4oQvq6N/[email protected]> Mon, 23 Jan 2017 14:31:19 +1100
Newsgroups gmane.org.user-groups.clug
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Ubiquity Edgerouter. They are really very good. Embedded Linux of course.

Sent from my iPhone

> On 23 Jan 2017, at 2:04 pm, Luke Mewburn <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> On Mon, Jan 09, 2017 at 10:11:20PM +1100, Tony Lewis wrote:
>  | I'm looking for a low power device to be a VPN end point, and I am
>  | after recommendations, please.
>  | 
>  | The key requirement is high VPN throughput.  I lean towards
>  | OpenVPN, but because it's single-threaded, it seems there are
>  | often struggles to get anywhere close to native throughput.  I
>  | understand IPSec implementations are/can be multithreaded, so that
>  | might better fit the bill.
>  | 
>  | HDMI and GPU and desktop stuff is not important.  Just low power,
>  | high crypto throughput, high reliability and solid Linux support.
>  | 
>  | Tony
> 
> Hi Tony,
> 
> As you probably know, various low TDP Intel CPUs support the
> AES-NI instructions, and newer OpenSSL has the ability to offload
> that to the CPU.
> E.g., my 3.5 year old Macbook Air has a 15W i7-4650U CPU @ 1.70GHz,
> and it has the AES CPU instructions.
> 
> How about an Intel NUC or one of an equivalent/cheaper unit
> from Gigabyte (etc), with a 15W or 35W CPU?
> Or is that outside your power/cost budget?
> 
> cheers,
> Luke.
> 
> -- 
> linux mailing list
> linux-w/[email protected]
> https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/linux

-- 
linux mailing list
linux-w/[email protected]
https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/linux