Re: [clug] low power device for VPN end point
Alex Ferrara <alex-ptpq7S77OxPh4oQvq6N/[email protected]> Mon, 23 Jan 2017 18:07:30 +1100
| Newsgroups | gmane.org.user-groups.clug |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
That is really disappointing. Does anyone know if things have improved since 2015 when that story was current? Alex Ferrara > On 23 Jan 2017, at 5:58 pm, Bob Edwards <bob-mVUT9YNL7HhWG/[email protected]> wrote: > > On 23/01/17 14:31, Alex Ferrara wrote: >> Ubiquity Edgerouter. They are really very good. Embedded Linux of course. > > https://news.slashdot.org/story/15/04/07/1740217/how-ubiquiti-networks-is-creatively-violating-the-gpl : > > "Networking company Ubiquiti Networks violates the GPL, but not in > the way you'd expect. Not only did the kernel shipped in their router > firmware not correspond to the sources given, but their failure to > provide the source led to a vulnerability they created being > unpatched long after its disclosure. They're maintaining the > appearance of compliance without actually complying with the GPL." > > references: Four ways Ubiquiti Networks is creatively violating the GPL > http://libertybsd.net/ubiquiti/ > > cheers, > > Bob Edwards. > >> >> Sent from my iPhone >> >>> On 23 Jan 2017, at 2:04 pm, Luke Mewburn <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>> On Mon, Jan 09, 2017 at 10:11:20PM +1100, Tony Lewis wrote: >>> | I'm looking for a low power device to be a VPN end point, and I am >>> | after recommendations, please. >>> | >>> | The key requirement is high VPN throughput. I lean towards >>> | OpenVPN, but because it's single-threaded, it seems there are >>> | often struggles to get anywhere close to native throughput. I >>> | understand IPSec implementations are/can be multithreaded, so that >>> | might better fit the bill. >>> | >>> | HDMI and GPU and desktop stuff is not important. Just low power, >>> | high crypto throughput, high reliability and solid Linux support. >>> | >>> | Tony >>> >>> Hi Tony, >>> >>> As you probably know, various low TDP Intel CPUs support the >>> AES-NI instructions, and newer OpenSSL has the ability to offload >>> that to the CPU. >>> E.g., my 3.5 year old Macbook Air has a 15W i7-4650U CPU @ 1.70GHz, >>> and it has the AES CPU instructions. >>> >>> How about an Intel NUC or one of an equivalent/cheaper unit >>> from Gigabyte (etc), with a 15W or 35W CPU? >>> Or is that outside your power/cost budget? >>> >>> cheers, >>> Luke. >>> >>> -- >>> linux mailing list >>> linux-w/[email protected] >>> https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/linux >> > > > -- > linux mailing list > linux-w/[email protected] > https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/linux -- linux mailing list linux-w/[email protected] https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/linux