Re: [clug] low power device for VPN end point
Rodney Peters <[email protected]> Tue, 24 Jan 2017 12:32:24 +1100
| Newsgroups | gmane.org.user-groups.clug |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On 24/01/17 10:03, Dale Shaw wrote: > Hi Peter, > > On 24 January 2017 at 09:06, Peter Barker <[email protected]> > wrote: >> On Mon, 23 Jan 2017, Dale Shaw wrote: >> >>> On Mon, 9 Jan 2017 at 10:23 pm, Tony Lewis <tony-n3rzuiU5/[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>>> I'm looking for a low power device to be a VPN end point, and I am after >>>> recommendations, please. >>> This is not quite what you've asked for -- it's not even Linux -- but > have >>> you considered something like this? >>> Juniper SRX110H2 (used, includes TransACT and NBN compatible VDSL2 >>> interface) >>> https://www.ebay.com.au/itm/292001464825 >> >> That's fast ethernet only. > That's correct. I wish being limited to only 100 Mb/s (65 Mb/s of IPsec VPN > [full packet size], according to the data sheet[1]) was a problem I needed > to work around. I assumed, perhaps incorrectly, that the requirement for > VPN implied a requirement for Internet. > > [...] > >> I've just purchased a mini-itx, supposedly-15W system from China. 6 > "ethernet cards". ~$200 sans-disks. >> > https://www.aliexpress.com/item/Firewall-Motherboar-J1900-10w-processor-based-firewall-motherboard-with-onboard-2GB-Ram/32749040807.html > Interesting. Let us know how you go with that. I'd particularly be interested in whether its UEFI has a "compatibility" mode. I'd prefer to stick with IPFire, but that uses an older, hardened kernel and my attempt to boot it from a UEFI machine was unreliable. IPFire do say that BIOS or compatibility mode is required. >> This is to replace my ailing Fit-PC which has served well for a decade, > but looks to be unsupported by the next Debian. I'm hoping to replace a > managed 24-port gigabit ethernet switch with this and a 5W 8-port gigabit > switch, resulting in lower overall power consumption (and a *much* simpler > setup!) > > If you were looking at collapsing it all into a single device, then I would > understand why the 8-port 10/100 Mb/s switch inside the SRX110 would be > seen as a limitation. > > Vaguely related: Last I picked up a pair of Supermicro E200-8D mini > servers. They're in a different league, price-wise, but they've been great. > In theory you could run a virtual instance of your favourite > router/firewall and, with AES-NI support, build a very high performance VPN > endpoint. > > Cheers, > Dale > > [1] http://www.juniper.net/assets/us/en/local/pdf/datasheets/1000281-en.pdf Cheers, Rod -- linux mailing list linux-w/[email protected] https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/linux