Re: [clug] Is a weekly RAID scrub too much?
Stephen Hocking <[email protected]> Sun, 26 Feb 2017 17:40:49 +1100
| Newsgroups | gmane.org.user-groups.clug |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CA+xzKjAi_XVkB=DFKV=MN4_ezQVXz05+PBgS1Fj4X8X6pRC2FA@mail.gmail.com> |
And for ZFS, the command is just that - "zpool scrub somepool" On 26 February 2017 at 17:32, Eyal Lebedinsky <[email protected]> wrote: > On 26/02/17 17:15, Paul Wayper wrote: > >> On 24/02/17 22:35, Eyal Lebedinsky wrote: >> >>> I was idly browsing when I came upon an announcement from Toshiba of a >>> new NAS >>> HDD family: >>> https://toshiba.semicon-storage.com/ap-en/product/storage- >>> products/client-hdd/mn05aca-mn04acaxxx.html >>> >>> >>> I took a look at the spec >>> https://toshiba.semicon-storage.com/content/dam/toshiba-ss/ >>> asia-pacific/docs/product/storage/product-manual/cHDD- >>> MN05ACA_MN04ACA_Product-overview.pdf >>> >>> and there I see >>> "Rated Annual Workload (Total TB Transferred per Year, R/W) 180 >>> TB/year". >>> and this is the same for the three models 4/6/8TB. >>> >>> Doing the math: a weekly scrub will read 52*8=416TB a year, more than >>> twice >>> the designed load. >>> Even a monthly scrub will use up more than half the workload. >>> >>> Is the scrub doing more harm than good by shortening the service life of >>> the >>> disk? >>> >> >> So, what do you mean by "weekly RAID scrub"? >> >> I've never heard of anyone doing this on a RAID array. >> >> I've used 'scrub' on a disk or files to overwrite them with random data to >> avoid anyone using a scanning electron microscope on them to view your >> data >> again. With disk geometries, cylinder tolerances, and encoding mechanisms >> these days, even overwriting with zeros will render the data inaccessible >> to >> almost all attackers. >> > > I use 'shred' for this. > > But I've never heard of 'RAID scrubbing'. What are you doing, Eyal? >> > > RAID scrub refers to, in linux software RAID, a 'check' request. It means > that > the full RAID is read and verified. For RAID6 it means P and Q are > verified. > > You start such a check with something like: > # echo 'check' >/sys/block/md127/md/sync_action > and then you can observe the progress with: > $ cat /proc/mdstat > Personalities : [raid6] [raid5] [raid4] > md127 : active raid6 sdi1[8] sde1[9] sdf1[11] sdh1[12] sdc1[0] sdg1[13] > sdd1[10] > 19534425600 blocks super 1.2 level 6, 512k chunk, algorithm 2 [7/7] > [UUUUUUU] > [======>..............] check = 31.7% (1241121264/3906885120) > finish=564.2min speed=78742K/sec > bitmap: 1/30 pages [4KB], 65536KB chunk > > cheers > > Have fun, >> >> Paul >> > > -- > Eyal Lebedinsky ([email protected]) > > > -- > linux mailing list > linux-w/[email protected] > https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/linux > -- "I and the public know what all schoolchildren learn Those to whom evil is done Do evil in return" W.H. Auden, "September 1, 1939" -- linux mailing list linux-w/[email protected] https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/linux