Re: Debian default font for Chinese display is not complete

Mark Smith <[email protected]> Fri, 20 Jan 2006 16:38:18 +0800
Newsgroups gmane.org.user-groups.linux.beijing.tech
Organization 中国惠普有限公司 (China Hewle tt-Packard Company, Ltd.)
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Hi all, glad to be here.

I have found that GNU Unifont works pretty well for X, and for apps that
need TTF, Cyberbit is adequate enough.
(Cyberbit is not included in Debian, as far as licensing goes.)

I too have noticed that xterm/uxterm are missing some Chinese
characters; the fix for this is to Ctrl-Right-Click within the xterm
window to bring up the fonts menu. (Change it to "large")

I cannot speak for the rest of X, unfortunately, but on the console side
I can launch to jfbterm -q -c other,GB2312,iconv,UTF-8 to view Chinese te=
xt.
I use system-wide UTF-8 for everything since it "just works" with
Japanese and Korean.

If you need to input Chinese in the console, zhcon would work. If I'm
not mistaken, both of these apps utilize GNU Unifont, and so can X apps.

Mark




Frederic Muller wrote:

> Actually further Googling lead me to this site which list "freely" or
> almost freely available Chinese font and the licensing issues. I found
> it quite insightful and guess might be of use to the list
> http://dev.gentoo.org/~liquidx/chinesefonts/
>
> So I guess my issue with AR PL kaitiM is the fact that they are not
> Unicode complete. Any idea how to make them all Unicode? Has anyone
> experience with this process and could give me some hint?
>
> Thanks.
>
> Fred
>
>
> William Poetra Yoga H wrote:
>
>> --- Frederic Muller <fred-GQxX53Lv/[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>> =20
>>
>>> Hi guys!
>>>
>>>  =20
>>
>>
>> Hi :) Sorry I'm a bit late; I didn't check my Yahoo! inbox...
>>
>> =20
>>
>>> I am currently using Debian in English but also need to display (and
>>> type eventually) Chinese. I followed some Internet resource to do
>>> that and it works almost well. The default font used by the system
>>> to do that is missing some Chinese characters. From all my KDE font
>>> settings it says it is Bitstream Vera, though after checking with
>>> Font viewer Bitsream Vera seems to have no Chinese character at all.
>>>
>>>  =20
>>
>>
>> I'm using Slackware in English, with LC_* set to "C" except for
>> LC_CTYPE, which
>> is set to zh_CN.gb2312 (I know I should move on to GBK someday). I
>> don't use
>> KDE (I use XFCE), but the settings should be quite common...
>>
>> =20
>>
>>> So I have in fact a few font related questions:
>>> - how do I find out which font is really being used?
>>> - How do you guys handle the problem?
>>>
>>> - How in open office when opening documents written on wndows do you
>>> get the right font selection to display all the Chinese characters
>>> without having to do a Select all - replace?
>>>
>>>  =20
>>
>>
>> I'm using the ukai and uming fonts from CJKUnifonts:
>> http://www.freedesktop.org/wiki/Software_2fCJKUnifonts
>> I think they're good, but I haven't tried wqy yet.
>>
>> For the ugly English characters problem, please take a look at my
>> blog and
>> scroll down (or search for "pango"):
>> http://wpyh.blogs.friendster.com/my_blog/
>>
>> I personally don't recommend SimSun and Cyberbit fonts, since they
>> are not
>> free, to the best of my knowledge. For the OpenOffice.org problem, I
>> set font
>> replacements (I use OOo 1.1.5, so for 2.0 it might be a bit
>> different). In
>> Tools->Options, you can set font replacements under the heading
>> "Fonts". I
>> usually set "=C3=8B=C3=8E=C3=8C=C3=A5" and "=C3=90=C3=82=C3=8B=C3=8E" =
to "AR PL Shanheisun Uni" (that's
>> uming). Then
>> for compatibility with MSO users you can use =C3=90=C3=82=C3=8B=C3=8E =
and it will appear
>> as uming
>> in your document.
>>
>> Hope this helps :)
>>
>>
>> William Poetra Yoga Hadisoeseno
>>
>> __________________________________________________
>> Do You Yahoo!?
>> Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
>> http://mail.yahoo.com _______________________________________________
>> blug-tech list
>> [email protected]
>> http://list.beijinglug.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/blug-tech
>>
>> =20
>>
> _______________________________________________
> blug-tech list
> [email protected]
> http://list.beijinglug.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/blug-tech