Re: red hat and fedora
Colin Charles <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.org.user-groups.linux.beijing |
|---|---|
| Organization | ByteBot.net |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Wed, 2004-11-24 at 14:08 +0800, Richard Ford wrote: > REDHAT IS FEDORA! Redhat + Community is fedora (though lots of Red Hat devels tend to run fedora) > Fedora is OWNED BY REDHAT Thats generally true > The ONLY difference between RH and FEDORA is that with RHLinux, Red > hat decided the development path. Now with FEDORA the communityhas a > greater input. Well, even then, its waning. We really have to work on our community process, but here's a little fruit: http://fedora.linux.duke.edu/wiki/index.cgi/Wishlist Lots of the community tend to come up with insane ideas, which is a major issue. They're just not clued in > Fedora is then turned into RedHat Linux as it goes down the > "development" path. Yes, thats been no secret. For every 3 releases of Fedora Core, with all the nice new stuff that we with new hardware just love, one release of RHEL will come out > FEDORA is RED HAT's community project. No lie there, its been stated as such > > as for Fedora, it's not a product of RH, so anybody can sell it to > > anyone who don't have broadband connection. As long as they follow: http://fedora.redhat.com/about/trademarks/ > > > > ON the box there is still the red hat logo and some reference to red > > > > hat. Very unwise -- Colin Charles, [email protected] http://www.bytebot.net/ "First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you win." -- Mohandas Gandhi _______________________________________________ blug-general list [email protected] http://list.beijinglug.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/blug-general