Re: Net broken

There is a problem between China Telecom and CNC right now.

Their in ability to get contracts sorted out and start to work as a
"unit" as opposed to treatign each others networks like fortified LAN's
is also a problem.

We have noticed that about from not being able to get reverse DNS setup
due to the problem.  We are having many packets from our data centre
(fibre to CNC) taking the logn way around and bouncign between cnc and
china telecom multiple times to get anywhere.

This has led us to the discovery of "Good IP" and "Bad IP".  I know -
it's pathetic - but this is China.

>From the same host with two IP's bound to the same NIC.  A transfer to
our HK server takes about 5-9K/sec with the "Bad IP".  A "good IP" does
it at a rate of 332K/sec!

Needless to say the good IP's are in short supply and we hold them close
to our chests....

Cheers,
RF.



On Thu, 2005-06-09 at 15:34 +0800, Graham Brown wrote:

> Dear all,
> seems thathere is something going on - at first I thought it was just 
> the usual June 4 thing but it is still going. The block point varies 
> among the servers, but it is there.
> 
>   6  172.30.77.57 (172.30.77.57)  5.333 ms  3.031 ms *
>   7  219.239.249.9 (219.239.249.9)  6.443 ms  9.230 ms *
>   8  202.99.57.233 (202.99.57.233)  6.850 ms  6.568 ms *
>   9  202.99.57.53 (202.99.57.53)  7.331 ms  8.494 ms *
> 10  219.142.0.1 (219.142.0.1)  12.281 ms  7.561 ms *
> 11  219.141.130.109 (219.141.130.109)  12.026 ms 219.141.130.125 
> (219.141.130.125)  7.730 ms 219.141.130.109 (219.141.130.109)  10.234 ms
> 12  202.97.57.217 (202.97.57.217)  73.087 ms 202.97.57.221 
> (202.97.57.221)  76.811 ms 202.97.57.217 (202.97.57.217)  72.009 ms
> 13  202.97.53.5 (202.97.53.5)  70.430 ms  71.349 ms 202.97.53.86 
> (202.97.53.86) 73.463 ms
> 14  202.97.53.82 (202.97.53.82)  75.262 ms 202.97.51.214 (202.97.51.214) 
>   323.678 ms  316.079 ms
> 15  202.97.51.214 (202.97.51.214)  327.650 ms 
> sl-gw29-ana-12-2.sprintlink.net (1
> 
> $ whois 202.97.51.214
> % [whois.apnic.net node-2]
> % Whois data copyright terms    http://www.apnic.net/db/dbcopyright.html
> 
> inetnum:      202.97.32.0 - 202.97.63.255
> netname:      CHINANET-BB
> descr:        CHINANET backbone network
> descr:        Data Communication Division
> descr:        China Telecom
> country:      CN
> admin-c:      CH93-AP
> tech-c:       CH93-AP
> mnt-by:       APNIC-HM
> mnt-lower:    MAINT-CHINANET
> changed:      [email protected] 20000801
> status:       ALLOCATED PORTABLE
> changed:      [email protected] 20041214
> source:       APNIC
> 
> person:       Chinanet Hostmaster
> address:      No.31 ,jingrong street,beijing
> address:      100032
> country:      CN
> phone:        +86-10-66027112
> fax-no:       +86-10-58501144
> e-mail:       [email protected]
> e-mail:       [email protected]
> nic-hdl:      CH93-AP
> mnt-by:       MAINT-CHINANET
> changed:      [email protected] 20021016
> remarks:      hostmaster is not for spam complaint,please send spam 
> complaint to [email protected]
> source:       APNIC
> 
> 
> Simon Cousins wrote:
> 
> > Hi Graham,
> > 
> > We've been having the worst problems with the Great Firewall for three weeks
> > now.  We have several friends and colleagues which have been suffering
> > similar random outages and blockages.
> > 
> > S.
> > 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: blug-general-bounces-+qp3TudyjKPvfBIPTTProkB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org
> > [mailto:blug-general-bounces-+qp3TudyjKPvfBIPTTProkB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org] On Behalf Of Graham Brown
> > Sent: Thursday, 9 June 2005 11:07 AM
> > To: Beijing LUG general non-technical discussion list - Not publicly posted
> > Subject: [blug-general] Net broken
> > 
> > Dear All,
> > 
> > The border routers seem to be very slow / broken.
> > Anyone know what the problem is or when it will be fixed?
> > 
> > Graham Brown
> > 
> > _______________________________________________
> > blug-general list
> > [email protected]
> > http://list.beijinglug.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/blug-general
> > 
> > _______________________________________________
> > blug-general list
> > [email protected]
> > http://list.beijinglug.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/blug-general
> > 
> _______________________________________________
> blug-general list
> [email protected]
> http://list.beijinglug.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/blug-general

_______________________________________________
blug-general list
[email protected]
http://list.beijinglug.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/blug-general