Re: 答复: [blug-general] Net broken
Graham Brown <[email protected]> Wed, 29 Jun 2005 14:42:29 +0800
| Newsgroups | gmane.org.user-groups.linux.beijing |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
HiBen, I just did a trace and it still clogs up about the border routers. The problem is not just the US - the link to Australia clogs up at about the same place. Regards, Graham Brown Ben Gunn wrote: > Wanted to do a quick survey on the Net Broken issue. For those who > mentioned you were having problems, are you still having problems now? > > > > Our company is still having problems with very unstable connections to > certain sites in the US (including our mail server). > > > > Regards, Ben > > > > _____ > > 浠朵汉: blug-general-bounces-+qp3TudyjKPvfBIPTTProkB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org > [mailto:blug-general-bounces-+qp3TudyjKPvfBIPTTProkB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org] 浠ｈ〃 Richard Ford > 堕: 2005骞613 16:41 > 朵欢浜: Beijing LUG general non-technical discussion list - Not publicly > posted > 涓婚: Re: [blug-general] Net broken > > > > We've actually (CANDIS) done a lot of research on this and spent many hours > on the phones with our ISP's and contacts and many traceroutes and arp table > lookups. Needless to say, I am paraphrasing here for brevity. And omiiting > some numbers and specs for commercial confidentiality. > > Cheers, > RF. > > On Mon, 2005-06-13 at 16:39 +0800, Richard Ford wrote: > > > > There is a problem between China Telecom and CNC right now. > > Their in ability to get contracts sorted out and start to work as a "unit" > as opposed to treatign each others networks like fortified LAN's is also a > problem. > > We have noticed that about from not being able to get reverse DNS setup due > to the problem. We are having many packets from our data centre (fibre to > CNC) taking the logn way around and bouncign between cnc and china telecom > multiple times to get anywhere. > > This has led us to the discovery of "Good IP" and "Bad IP". I know - it's > pathetic - but this is China. > >>From the same host with two IP's bound to the same NIC. A transfer to our > HK server takes about 5-9K/sec with the "Bad IP". A "good IP" does it at a > rate of 332K/sec! > > Needless to say the good IP's are in short supply and we hold them close to > our chests.... > > Cheers, > RF. > > > > On Thu, 2005-06-09 at 15:34 +0800, Graham Brown wrote: > > > Dear all, > seems thathere is something going on - at first I thought it was just > the usual June 4 thing but it is still going. The block point varies > among the servers, but it is there. > > 6 172.30.77.57 (172.30.77.57) 5.333 ms 3.031 ms * > 7 219.239.249.9 (219.239.249.9) 6.443 ms 9.230 ms * > 8 202.99.57.233 (202.99.57.233) 6.850 ms 6.568 ms * > 9 202.99.57.53 (202.99.57.53) 7.331 ms 8.494 ms * > 10 219.142.0.1 (219.142.0.1) 12.281 ms 7.561 ms * > 11 219.141.130.109 (219.141.130.109) 12.026 ms 219.141.130.125 > (219.141.130.125) 7.730 ms 219.141.130.109 (219.141.130.109) 10.234 ms > 12 202.97.57.217 (202.97.57.217) 73.087 ms 202.97.57.221 > (202.97.57.221) 76.811 ms 202.97.57.217 (202.97.57.217) 72.009 ms > 13 202.97.53.5 (202.97.53.5) 70.430 ms 71.349 ms 202.97.53.86 > (202.97.53.86) 73.463 ms > 14 202.97.53.82 (202.97.53.82) 75.262 ms 202.97.51.214 (202.97.51.214) > 323.678 ms 316.079 ms > 15 202.97.51.214 (202.97.51.214) 327.650 ms > sl-gw29-ana-12-2.sprintlink.net (1 > > $ whois 202.97.51.214 > % [whois.apnic.net node-2] > % Whois data copyright terms http://www.apnic.net/db/dbcopyright.html > > inetnum: 202.97.32.0 - 202.97.63.255 > netname: CHINANET-BB > descr: CHINANET backbone network > descr: Data Communication Division > descr: China Telecom > country: CN > admin-c: CH93-AP > tech-c: CH93-AP > mnt-by: APNIC-HM > mnt-lower: MAINT-CHINANET > changed: [email protected] 20000801 > status: ALLOCATED PORTABLE > changed: [email protected] 20041214 > source: APNIC > > person: Chinanet Hostmaster > address: No.31 ,jingrong street,beijing > address: 100032 > country: CN > phone: +86-10-66027112 > fax-no: +86-10-58501144 > e-mail: [email protected] > e-mail: [email protected] > nic-hdl: CH93-AP > mnt-by: MAINT-CHINANET > changed: [email protected] 20021016 > remarks: hostmaster is not for spam complaint,please send spam > complaint to [email protected] > source: APNIC > > > Simon Cousins wrote: > > >>Hi Graham, >> >>We've been having the worst problems with the Great Firewall for three > > weeks > >>now. We have several friends and colleagues which have been suffering >>similar random outages and blockages. >> >>S. >> >>-----Original Message----- >>From: blug-general-bounces-+qp3TudyjKPvfBIPTTProkB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org >>[mailto:blug-general-bounces-+qp3TudyjKPvfBIPTTProkB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org] On Behalf Of Graham > > Brown > >>Sent: Thursday, 9 June 2005 11:07 AM >>To: Beijing LUG general non-technical discussion list - Not publicly > > posted > >>Subject: [blug-general] Net broken >> >>Dear All, >> >>The border routers seem to be very slow / broken. >>Anyone know what the problem is or when it will be fixed? >> >>Graham Brown >> >>_______________________________________________ >>blug-general list >>[email protected] >>http://list.beijinglug.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/blug-general >> >>_______________________________________________ >>blug-general list >>[email protected] >>http://list.beijinglug.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/blug-general >> > > _______________________________________________ > blug-general list > [email protected] > http://list.beijinglug.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/blug-general > > _______________________________________________ > blug-general list > [email protected] > http://list.beijinglug.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/blug-general > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > _______________________________________________ > blug-general list > [email protected] > http://list.beijinglug.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/blug-general _______________________________________________ blug-general list [email protected] http://list.beijinglug.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/blug-general