Re: Follow-up clarifications

I am glad that someone as well known and participative in this thread as
yourself, feels capable to comment on our likes, dislikes, policy and
beliefs.

Don't patronise the list or I John.  We weren't born yesterday.

Be constructive or piss off.  If your claim is true to want to debate,
you knew my email address all along.  No need to post here.

Just what is your agenda?

You are as transparent as well behaving kid the week before Christmas.

RF.





On Mon, 2004-04-12 at 12:18, John Lombard wrote:
> By the way -- I am not an expert in Linux, and I'm quite aware that my post has
> nothing to do with Linux.  But then -- as clearly acknowledged by Richard in the
> title of his post -- this article had nothing to do with Linux.
> 
> I responded for one simple reason -- within the confines of the subject matter
> of this post, I felt that Richard was displaying a gross degree of ignorance on
> the subject of Chinese culture; that those comments were both inaccurate AND
> inappropriate in a forum like this; and that his subsequent self-justifications
> were spurious and without merit.
> 
> If people want to remove this thread, no problem; I agree that it is entirely
> inappropriate for a forum such as this.
> 
> On the other hand, if Richard wants "debate" on this subject -- as he claimed he
> did with Fred -- then that's exactly what I'm quite happy to give him.
> 
> Personally, I think he'd be better to stick to Linux -- something he at least
> knows something about.
> 
> _______________________________________________
> blug-general list
> [email protected]
> http://list.beijinglug.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/blug-general

_______________________________________________
blug-general list
[email protected]
http://list.beijinglug.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/blug-general