1:2.1.29-1+deb10u5? Re: upgrade-in-place to Mailman 2.1.30 and want to test Mailman3?

Will 1:2.1.29-1+deb10u5 suffice?  That's the latest (and fairly likely
to be last) Debian version from the mailman 2.x series.
That is also the version that's currently running on lists.balug.org
and has been running there for quite a long time ... since at least
2022-08-11T01:16:18.162191795Z.

Notes / See also:
https://snapshot.debian.org/binary/mailman/
https://lists.balug.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/balug-test
https://wiki.debian.org/LTS LTS support for Debian 10 continues
through 2024-06-30

On Fri, Mar 1, 2024 at 3:00 PM Local mailing list for the CABAL Linux
user group. <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> Quoting Local mailing list for the CABAL Linux user group. ([email protected]):
>
> [This was Ron in BC.]
>
> > I'm really feeling the nudge to set up a Mailman3 instance.
>
> I'm not.  But I've already clarified my views about Mailman3.
> To my knowledge, Mailman3 and latter releases of Mailman 2.1.x
> both have the same DMARC mitigation options.  (I have not lately
> checked to see if Mailman3 has evolved further, but mostly because of
> antipathy to the thing.  If you want to look into that question, it
> might be interesting.
>
> > If I were to set up a test list or two in Mailman3, would you be
> > interested in checking out the features?
>
> I don't want to seem ungrateful, but I'm not sure I should spare the
> time.  There's a bunch of things that already need doing, and I'm not
> sure what I'd learn from that, that has utility in my use-case --
> unless there's some actual advantage.
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> conspire mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://linuxmafia.com/mailman/listinfo/conspire

_______________________________________________
conspire mailing list
[email protected]
http://linuxmafia.com/mailman/listinfo/conspire