Recipes (are public domain)
Rick Moen <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.org.user-groups.linux.cabal |
|---|---|
| Organization | If you lived here, you'd be $HOME already. |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
I'd long reasonably believed that recipes (for food) are per-se public domain ab initio, not eligible for copyright. Reason? Because they are not "literary works" within the meaning of that term in USA copyright law (as does, for example, software), and because they don't fall into any of the other copyright-eligible categories of original, creative expressions fixed in a tangible medium. But there was room to doubt that, and it's nice to be sure. A while back, I found a competent good-enough legal analysis on that question, and the answer is "yes": https://www.findlaw.com/smallbusiness/intellectual-property/copyrighting-recipes.html Thus, I have a modest and growing collection of... er... five recipes in good ol' HTML5. Added just today: Chocolate Decadence. (The 1980s called and want their trendy dessert back). http://linuxmafia.com/~rick/recipes/ There's a sixth, Cod alla Livornese, that I have not yet HTMLised, having very recently snagged it from the author's posting to Nextdoor. As always with public domain works, the problem is the -other- stuff you might want to include. For the five HTMLised recipes, I've found copylefted or similarly licensed photography of the same or a very similar dish, usually from Wikimedia Project (umbrella for Wikipedia, etc.). As a collector of recipes off the Web, pictures are often An Annoying Problem. The recipe itself is absolutely legal to reproduce no matter what bullshit copyright statement appears on the original page, and there's a _vast_ number of fabulous recipes on the Web. But ixnay on the accompanying photo. Borrowing that could get you on the wrong side of a tort complaint. There are probably many images whose creators would be glad to issue suitable licensing, but it doesn't occur to them, so photos with no specific creator credit or that appear on a page with a copyright notice without "open content" licensing are not safe to reuse. Of course, one obvious fallback is: Cook it, take a good photo, and then use that with "open content" licensing. I just don't necessarily feel like baking (say) Knekkebrød when I'm HTMLising a recipe for it. And the other thing you would want to avoid including is other author material surrounding the recipe, e.g., the great cookbook author Peg Bracken's funny and breezy stories in her I Hate to Cook Book series. Nope, don't. That part is "literary work", thus copyright-covered. Picture a WikiRecipes site, some day. Including all of Peg Bracken's recipes, all of Julia Child's, etc. Totally lawful. Just needs transcribing (or copypasta from e-books or anywhere else), and HTMLising. And photos. And curation. _______________________________________________ conspire mailing list [email protected] http://linuxmafia.com/mailman/listinfo/conspire