Re: Recipes (are public domain)
Rick Moen <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.org.user-groups.linux.cabal |
|---|---|
| Organization | If you lived here, you'd be $HOME already. |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
I honestly should have checked: > Picture a WikiRecipes site, some day. It's 2024. Some guy has http://wikirecipes.com/ running on a WordPress blog engine. _But_ the usual cluelnessness about copyright prevails there, and other badness. Example recipe: http://wikirecipes.com/recipe-items/fragrant-chinese-beef-stew/ One cannot help notice that that is _not_ a photo of Fragrant Chinese Beef Stew, just before noticing the photo is uncredited. If it were a correct photo, the lack of a credit and lack of licence statement would matter. Then, under the recipe title is a bunch of SEO gibberish. Credit for creating the recipe goes to: "Wikirecipes". No, I really don't think so. (On a brief check, it appears that all of the recipes are credited to this non-person. This is the sort of bullshit that some computerists like to do, I notice, pretending as if they don't exist and ought to just be behind an anonymity curtain even for copyright and accountability purposes. I don't care much for this.) To his credit, the anonymous author has brought the matter to Wikimedia Foundation's attention: https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/WikiRecipes He and commenters also mention some extant sites including WikiBooks's "Wikimedia Cookbook" at https://en.wikibooks.org/wiki/Cookbook:Table_of_Contents Wikimedia Foundation also has a _proposal_, listing some possible domains for a recipes wiki: https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/WikiRecipe The wiki concept's a fine thing. But IMO there's quite a bit of value in knowing a recipe is that of a real, named person who has a track record for good recipes, e.g., Peg Bracken. And given that all of those are copyright-ineligible, why not concentrate on such?