Organized labour in Big Tech [was something else]
Ron <[email protected]> Thu, 2 Oct 2025 13:26:04 -0700
| Newsgroups | gmane.org.user-groups.linux.cabal |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Don Marti wrote on 2025-10-02 08:24: > It's also a labor vs. capital thing -- the AI boom is part of the > reaction to the tech worker union movement. I missed "the tech worker union movement". A couple posts on a couple forums saying "why, we oughta..." in an almost wistful manner, that's it. I've never, ever heard of a unionization vote at a tech company - any example? > the next move by management was > to containerize and push more of the cargo handling to warehouses, which > are smaller workplaces that can be geographically isolated from the port > area. And geographically closer to customers, and on *cheaper land*. > Cargo handling became more efficient with containerization, but a > big part of the appeal for management was in reducing the number of > people working close together at the port where they could organize. I think that multi-modal efficiency and cheaper land were overwhelming factors. Sure, management hates labour, but management also is adept at crushing unionization drives. > When organized labor started to catch on at the "Big Tech" companies Again, outside Amazon warehouses, which aren't really what I see as "Big *Tech*" and were mostly failures, where's the organized labour drive(s) happening?