Re: Reboot:Relevance

"PUB @ Keystreams.net" <[email protected]> Tue, 10 Jan 2017 18:11:05 -0700

Newsgroups	gmane.org.user-groups.linux.calgary.general
Organization	Keystreams
Message-ID	<[email protected]>

to kill the name and abandon the original concept of a LUG perhaps, to embrace and expand and to reinvent is the question I'm getting from this...

Down With CLUG! All Hail the New CLUG, er, CLUG OF EXPANDED DIMENSIONS - meaning after that we are all CLUGed!

for curiosity, can we see a show of hands of who is reading this mailing list - I think after all that it's the real glue?

/me raises his hand

one ping, one ping only...

On 01/10/2017 05:35 PM, Juan Alberto Cirez wrote:
> Good evening fellow CLUG-philes,
> I have observed the posts for the past several years and my take away is
> that we have lost a bit of relevance. By that I mean we tend to post and
> discuss topics that are at best dated, and at worst irrelevant to the
> idea of driving GNU/Linux forward.
> The world today is dominated by private/public clouds,  microservises,
> containers, virtualization, big data, machine learning, etc.
> Seriously, when was the last time these topics came up for discussion?
> Knowing GNU/Linux is the nexus of all these technologies I have been
> surprised they have been ignored. I mean, Openstack and other
> orquestration technologies. Docker and other container technologies.
> Kubernetes, mesos,etc.
> Building a microcluster out of raspberry pi3s. Building a socket
> swarm...the sky is the limit.
> This is the golden age of GNU/Linux. We should be celebrating!!!
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> clug-talk mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://clug.ca/mailman/listinfo/clug-talk_clug.ca
> Mailing List Guidelines (http://clug.ca/ml_guidelines.php)
> **Please remove these lines when replying
>

_______________________________________________
clug-talk mailing list
[email protected]
http://clug.ca/mailman/listinfo/clug-talk_clug.ca
Mailing List Guidelines (http://clug.ca/ml_guidelines.php)
**Please remove these lines when replying

signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, 819 B)