Re: [sec-daemons] Re: Linux in secdaemons

Guys,
Read this:
http://ask.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=07/03/03/028258

--- On Tue, 10/6/09, Josh Mueller <[email protected]> wrote:

> From: Josh Mueller <[email protected]>
> Subject: Re: [sec-daemons] Re: Linux in secdaemons
> To: "Joseph Booker" <[email protected]>
> Cc: [email protected], css_acm_general_list-xGejAJT2w6zyxAk2GeU8lTe48wsgrGvP@public.gmane.org, [email protected]
> Date: Tuesday, October 6, 2009, 6:26 AM
> >
> > I agree. [I also agree with you on etc being et
> cetera, esp. since /etc
> > contains binary files and executables]
> 
> As someone who is in the IASE program as a freshman I am
> interested in
> this group, sadly all the meetings this semester conflict
> with my
> current classes. I have been reading the emails sent to me,
> but do to
> time constraints am also unable to access the IRC channel.
> 
> In the email sent by Josepth Booker quoted above I would
> have to
> disagree on the pronunciation. In my education at a
> previous school in
> my Linux classes we were taught that "etc" is pronounced
> "et see",
> it's most similar in the Windows environment (to me) to the
> C:/Windows
> directory. For example a "/etc" sub folder holds init.d,
> the
> scheduling daemon, and another child folder holds the
> passwd file,
> login info.
> 
> Josh
> _______________________________________________
> sec-daemons mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://mailman.depaul.edu/mailman/listinfo/sec-daemons
> 
_______________________________________________
DLC mailing list
[email protected]
http://mailman.depaul.edu/mailman/listinfo/dlc
Use the Above Link to Unsubcribe!!
http://linux.depaul.edu/