Re: [DLC]>4G ram/64 bit OS
Joseph Booker <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.org.user-groups.linux.depaul-lug |
|---|---|
| Organization | neoturbine |
| Message-ID | <20091124101906.2005b54a@fenrir> |
On Mon, 23 Nov 2009 15:32:45 -0800 (PST) Politik Durden <politikdurden-/[email protected]> wrote: > Thanks for all the responses. As usual, I've been pointed in the > right direction. > > I'm leaning toward a full 64 bit OS (instead of PAE) so now the > question is, *generally speaking* (I know my mileage may vary), are > 64 bit drivers readily available ? Do the major distributions have a > compatibility list (similar to Windows Marketplace) that shows the 64 > bit devices that have been tested (and have stable drivers) for a > particular distro ? > > In the past year I've see more average users with 64 bit OSes (Vista) > than I've seen in all my years of messing around with computers. Is > the same trend happening in the Linux world ? If the driver is open source, it'll work under x86, amd64, MIPS, etc, etc provided the hardware can handle the device. The only closed source drivers you'd probably use (excluding stuff like firmware with open source drivers) is likely just the video, and those are released for amd64/emt64 too. Unix/C was made for source compatibility regardless of the actual architecture it is run on. Thankfully Linux inherits that :) -- Joseph Booker _______________________________________________ DLC mailing list [email protected] http://mailman.depaul.edu/mailman/listinfo/dlc Use the Above Link to Unsubcribe!! http://linux.depaul.edu/
signature.asc
(application/pgp-signature, 198 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.13 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAksMB4YACgkQMX8g4/ndhm1bhACfcuS76PYreXqwT4wFmnwlEe9Z nMoAnA/E9jeCnNcMf8JAckoNhw/dwJqq =mQJu -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----