Re: Down with Canonical - Boycott Ubuntu Spyware
Gene <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.org.user-groups.linux.dunedin.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CAMx+XZ0c-2z4n5UV96WzyyXLDMXFTJcSxV-xAA9SMUtDuBSW3Q@mail.gmail.com> |
Not an accurate comparison. All your examples involving exchanging currency for goods or services for payment have an implicit contract - something that has been agreed upon in advance by both parties. Artists who create commissioned work will be under similar expectations - the work must be suitable for display, not smell like horse poo, etc. Something more accurate would be: Steve takes a nice photo of a sunset, and makes it available online for free. Jess downloads it, and emails Steve "Your photo sucks, you have no talent. I demand a better photo at high resolution by tomorrow so I can hang it in my business to impress my clients. In future please consult with me before taking photos so I can have direct input into your process". What do you think Steve will say? On Mon, Jan 28, 2013 at 10:31 AM, Bob Brown <[email protected]> wrote: > Just because someone wrote more than two paragraphs of text and cites some URLs does not make it a robust criticism. Thomi hit it on other head - if you have something to contribute then do so - coming here and spreading FUD is not contributing. Its pretty easy to see how the original post could have been made a positive contribution instead of a cry to take up arms and boycott (are we children?!) > > By all means discuss an issue but consider your words - you CAN rip a shred off someone for serving you the wrong food or not quickly enough but you don't have to be that person. > > -B. > > Kathinka <[email protected]> wrote: > >>Thomi objects to robust criticism of work: >> >>>You wouldn't talk about >>> someone's creation to their faces in this manner, so don't do it online. >> >>He's wrong. People who provide goods and services, and those who work >>for an employer, have to face criticism where their work has not come >>up to the standard expected. Sometimes the criticism is richly >>deserved e.g. restaurant where diner is informed that a dish is >>gluten-free when it is not. Sometimes it is 50-50 e.g. builder who >>builds architect-designed house suitable for dry climate, not for >>Auckland. He could have warned the client, but it was the architect's >>job to design for the conditions and the client's not to insist on a >>design unsuitable for the conditions. >> >>Artists - painters, actors, sculptors, musicians - face public >>criticism including from people who have not paid (public art, music >>on the radio) for their works. >> >>Employers are constrained, by the possibility of legal action, in the >>language they can use to employees - but unlike clients and consumers, >>they can with due process get rid of an employee who does not please >>them. >> >>It's no good any of these other people saying, "But I was trying >>really hard, I work long hours, don't speak harshly to me because that >>hurts my feelings." >> >>Well they can SAY it of course. >> >>Kathinka. >> >>On 28 January 2013 08:01, Thomi Richards <[email protected]> wrote: >>> Hi, >>> >>> >>> On 28 January 2013 03:06, Chris Bannister <[email protected]> >>> wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>> Oh, so we are supposed to walk on egg shells because of this? >>>> But, I do agree that the subject wording is a bit on the strong side, >>>> although >>>> perhaps understandable considering the expectations of FOSS and >>>> GNU/Linux. >>>> >>> >>> Yes. It's called "being a decent human being". You wouldn't talk about >>> someone's creation to their faces in this manner, so don't do it online. >>> >>>> >>>> It will be a sad day when issues can't be discussed openly and without >>>> any fear of retribution. Some people actually run Linux because it is >>>> not led by decisions made in some board room. >>>> >>> >>> I welcome constructive discussion. I've already accepted an invitation to >>> wax lyrical about the Ubuntu phone. When that happens, I'll answer any >>> questions they have, as long as I'm able. I don't welcome ranty, >>> poorly-researched attacks with no substantive value. >>> >>> What pisses me off in general is the fact that we get worse community press >>> than Apple. We get worse community press than Microsoft. The icing on the >>> cake is that the people writing these articles are Linux users - they're the >>> people we're building this thing for. They're the people we work 12 hour >>> days for. They're our bloody target audience, and some of them show their >>> gratitude by flinging mud at the target of the day. >>> >>> Please, by all means - contribute to the project. Hundreds, if not thousands >>> of people do already (I guess it depends on how you count it). File a bug, >>> or do some translations, or do ISO testing, or write a juju charm, or write >>> some documentation, or fix some bugs, or join the local Loco team, or host >>> an installfest, or talk at your local high school... many of you do these >>> things already - and I'd like to take this opportunity to thank you for your >>> effort. >>> >>> If we want Linux to succeed on the desktop/phone/tablet/pc/car/whatever, we >>> need to find a way to silence the trolls. >>> >>> -- >>> Thomi Richards >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> DunLUG mailing list >>> [email protected] >>> http://lists.ethernal.org/listinfo/dunlug >>> DunLUG Wiki - http://dunlug.kallisti.net.nz/ >> >> >> >>-- >> >> >>IMPORTANT: If you forward this e-mail please delete the forwarding >>history which includes my e-mail address. >>It's a courtesy to all of us who may not wish to have our e-mail >>addresses sent all over the world. Thank you. >> >>"A liberty is not the same as a right, because the latter entails a >>reciprocal obligation on someone else's part." Thomas Szasz >> >>_______________________________________________ >>DunLUG mailing list >>[email protected] >>http://lists.ethernal.org/listinfo/dunlug >>DunLUG Wiki - http://dunlug.kallisti.net.nz/ > _______________________________________________ > DunLUG mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.ethernal.org/listinfo/dunlug > DunLUG Wiki - http://dunlug.kallisti.net.nz/ _______________________________________________ DunLUG mailing list [email protected] http://lists.ethernal.org/listinfo/dunlug DunLUG Wiki - http://dunlug.kallisti.net.nz/