Re: The Ubuntu issues
Thomi Richards <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.org.user-groups.linux.dunedin.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CAN2KdQ9Jtqfn5RwjD65oWQvv0hK3AxJEft8C18UWZoz4_LgwXw@mail.gmail.com> |
On 31 January 2013 15:44, Chris Bannister <[email protected]> wrote: > That's fine, as long as it's an *OPT-IN* feature. (Would you like me to > hassle you to buy double glazing, and then get you to jump through hoops so > that you don't get bothered anymore? HINT, if someone wants double > glazing they will certailnly hunt a supplier out themselves.) I see your point, but surely if everyone followed this pattern you'd end up in the state where user action was required for any sort of innovation? The default installation would be something like debian 1.0, and the user would have to install ("opt-in") for everything they wanted, including kernel drivers, better tools, window managers... and the shopping lens. Clearly that's a ridiculous example, but it serves to demonstrate the reason why sometimes, things are turned on by default. -- Thomi Richards _______________________________________________ DunLUG mailing list [email protected] http://lists.ethernal.org/listinfo/dunlug DunLUG Wiki - http://dunlug.kallisti.net.nz/