Re: Backup solutions wanted
Jim Tittsler <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.org.user-groups.linux.hawkes-bay |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Sun, May 31, 2009 at 09:29, chris morris <[email protected]> wrote: > The 1TB drive in this machine currently holds about 600GB of digital > photography., so I dont want to rewrite the whole lot every night :) > I also dont have room for multiple dated copies of the 600GB of data. That's the clever thing about rdiff-backup saving reverse diffs... if the file hasn't changed, it doesn't consume any space. There can still be a subtle advantage over rsync, because if something bad happens (like files or directory being inadvertently deleted) to the source and you don't notice before the cron job does the periodic rsync you end up with a second copy of that new tree... while rdiff-backup would let you back-up in time before the accident.